Skip to content

Polidocanol Foam With or Without Transdermal Laser in Varicose Veins

Comparação da eficácia clínica e estética Entre o Tratamento de Varizes Com Espuma de Polidocanol Associada ou não ao Laser transdérmico: Ensaio clínico Randomizado

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07276243
Acronym
FOAM-LASER
Enrollment
102
Registered
2025-12-10
Start date
2026-03-24
Completion date
2027-12-30
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Varicose Veins

Brief summary

This randomized, parallel clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment will compare the clinical and aesthetic outcomes of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy alone versus polidocanol foam associated with long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG transdermal laser in the treatment of lower-limb tributary varicose veins. The primary endpoint is venous occlusion rate at 30 days, assessed by Doppler ultrasound. Secondary outcomes include cutaneous hyperpigmentation, pain, patient satisfaction, and adverse events.

Detailed description

The study aims to evaluate whether the association of transdermal Nd:YAG 1064 nm laser with polidocanol foam improves venous occlusion and aesthetic outcomes compared to foam alone. Participants will be adult patients with lower limb varicose veins CEAP 1-3 confirmed by Doppler ultrasound. After randomization (1:1), the control group will receive 0.5% polidocanol foam, while the intervention group will receive 0.25% polidocanol foam followed by transdermal laser application. A second session will be performed only if partial occlusion persists at the 30-day follow-up. Assessments will include venous occlusion at 30, 90 and 180 days after the procedure, pigmentation, pain intensity, number of sessions required, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Standardized photographs will be taken at baseline, 30, 90 and 180 days.

Interventions

Polidocanol foam prepared using the Tessari method. Concentration 0,5% (Foam Arm) or 0,25% (Foam + Laser Arm), injected under ultrasound guidance.

DEVICETransdermal Nd:YAG 1064 nm laser

Long-pulse Nd:YAG 1064 nm transdermal laser applied along the treated vein path immediately after foam injection.

Sponsors

Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Randomization will be performed in a 1:1 ratio using a concealed allocation sequence accessible only at the time of treatment by a staff member not involved in outcome assessment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 21 to 75 years * CEAP clinical class 1-3 * Lower limb tributary varicose veins 2,5 to 4,0 mm in diameter on Doppler ultrasound. * Vein depth up to 4 mm from the skin surface. * Tributary vein may originate from the great or small saphenous vein as long as the saphenous vein is competent on Doppler. * Reflux limited to the target tributary. * Body mass index (BMI) \< 35 km²/m² * Able and willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* CEAP clinical class ≥ 4 * Axial reflux of the great or small saphenous vein requiring prior treatment * Tributary vein diameter \< 2.5 mm or \> 4.0 mm on Doppler * Tributary vein depth \> 4 mm from the skin surface * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to polidocanol * History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in the last 6 months * Use of anticoagulant therapy that cannot be safely interrupted * Active skin infection or ulcer at the treatment site * Autoimmune or connective tissue disease with active vasculitis * BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² * Inability to comply with follow-up visits * Previous treatment of the target vein in the past 6 months (laser, foam, surgery, or microphlebectomy).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Venous occlusion rate at 30 days30 days after the first sessionUltrasound assessment of the treated vein segment 30 days after the first session, defined as complete absence of detectable flow in the treated vein or partial occlusion with significant reduction in reflux and/or venous diameter, and performed by an independent physician who is blinded to group assignment and not involved in the treatment procedures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Venous occlusion rate at 90 days90 days after the first sessionUltrasound assessment of the treated vein segment 90 days after the first session, defined as complete occlusion or partial occlusion with improvement inreflux and/or reduction in venous diameter, and performed by an independent physician who is blinded to group assignment and not involved in the treatment procedures.
Final venous occlusion rate at 180 days180 days after the first sessionUltrasound assessment of the treated vein segment 180 days after the first session, defined as complete absence of detectable flow in the treated vein or partial occlusion with significant reduction in reflux and/or venous diameter, and performed by an independent physician who is blinded to group assignment and not involved in the treatment procedures.
Pain intensity immediately after the procedureImmediately after the procedure (within 30 minutes)Participant-reported pain intensity in the treated limb, measured immediately after the session, using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Higher scores indicate greater pain.
Hyperpigmentation at the treated site30, 90, and 180 days after the first session.Skin hyperpigmentation will be assessed by an independent physician blinded to the treatment allocation, using standardized comparative photographs obtained at baseline, 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days.
Number of treatment sessions requiredUp to 90 days after the first session.Total number of sessions needed to achieve venous occlusion according to the study protocol (maximum of two sessions).
Patient-reported aesthetic satisfactionAssessed at 90 days after the first session.Patient global assessment of cosmetic improvement using a 5-point Likert scale (from "no improvement" to "complete improvement").

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

CONTACTJuliana de Miranda Vieira, PhD
juliana.vieira@hupe.uerj.br+ 55 21 99972 2885
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJuliana Vieira, PhD

Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto - UERJ

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026