Skip to content

Laparoscopic Skills Acquisition Using an AI-enhanced Game-based Simulation Tool Compared With a Laparoscopic Simulator Box Trainer

Creating New Models of Laparoscopic Surgery Skills Acquisition and Assessment: Randomised-controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Skills Acquisition Using an AI-enhanced Game-based Simulation Tool Compared With a Laparoscopic Simulator Box Trainer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07276022
Acronym
CAMELs-RCT
Enrollment
157
Registered
2025-12-10
Start date
2025-11-19
Completion date
2026-07-31
Last updated
2026-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Surgery

Keywords

surgery, global health, simulation, skills acquisition, training, artificial intelligence, machine learning, serious gaming

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an AI-enhanced, game-based laparoscopic simulation tool can improve laparoscopic skills training and help increase surgical capacity in surgical trainees and other healthcare professionals learning laparoscopic surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does an AI-enhanced game-based simulator lead to faster and/or higher quality acquisition of laparoscopic technical skills than a standard box trainer? * Is AI-enhanced game-based simulation a feasible and scalable model for laparoscopic skills training across diverse healthcare settings? * Researchers will compare training with the Laptitude AI-enhanced game-based simulator to training with a standard laparoscopic box trainer to see if the AI-enhanced approach results in better performance on validated laparoscopic skills assessments and more efficient training. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to train using either the Laptitude AI-enhanced game-based simulator or a standard box trainer. * Complete a structured programme of laparoscopic training tasks. * Undergo standardized assessments of laparoscopic skills performance during and/or after the training period.

Detailed description

Surgery is an indispensable part of healthcare but it is lacking resources. It is estimated that an additional 143 million additional surgical operations are needed each year and that 1.5 million deaths would be prevented if these operations were available. Over the next decade, the lack of surgery is projected to cost $10 billion in lost global gross domestic product (GDP). There is an urgent need to train surgeons as this expertise is scarce. However, experience is unpredictable, skills remain unquantified, trainees require supervision, and surgeons undergo long periods of training following medical school. Surgical training which is based on graduated responsibility, defined as the progressive accumulation of skill by surgical residents that allows for the granting of greater involvement and independence by senior surgeons, forms much of the groundwork for surgical residency training. Laparoscopic techniques have transformed surgery, being associated with less pain, lower infection rates and shorter length of stay. Of the 143 million additional operations required to meet basic needs and save lives, 28 million (20%) could be done using minimally invasive techniques. Surgeons need comprehensive training in this area through skill-based models and measurable assessment of skill acquisition to effectively track and understand the development of competencies. There is an added interest in understanding if non-MDs (non-medical doctors), undergoing similar training in laparoscopic procedures can reproduce the skills of conventionally trained surgeons. Simulator training is a skills-based model for developing effective laparoscopic surgical skills, but existing simulators may not accurately represent real life conditions. There is a need to identify and develop high-fidelity simulators which can substitute for operative time in skill-acquisition. The creation and deployment of complex interventions like laparoscopic skills training is challenging. Technological innovations are often complex in themselves, and they necessitate expertise and backing from a broad group of stakeholders. Furthermore, these interventions must be sufficiently flexible to meet needs across a diverse range of healthcare settings. The successful delivery of health technology programs, including laparoscopic skills training, necessitates the strong and early engagement of patients, practitioners, and policy makers. This shifts the focus from a binary question of effectiveness, to whether interventions can be acceptable, implementable, cost-effective, scalable, and transportable across settings. This study will therefore evaluate approaches to increase surgical capacity based on the creation of new models for laparoscopic surgical skills acquisition, including this randomised controlled trial comparing of an AI-enhanced game-based simulation tool (Laptitude, Grendel Games) compared with a standard laparoscopic simulator box trainer.

Interventions

DEVICEAI-enhanced game-based simulation tool (Laptitude)

A surgical simulation game-based platform comprising controllers and software delivered via a laptop computer

DEVICELaparoscopic simulator box trainer (SurgTrac)

eoSim SurgTrac box trainer platform

Sponsors

University of Edinburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Novice medical students: no previous experience previous simulation training and/or operative experience. * Novice medically-qualified doctors (MDs): no previous experience previous simulation training and/or operative experience. * Intermediate experience medical students: previously used laparoscopic simulator box trainer. * Intermediate experience medically-qualified doctors (MDs): previously used laparoscopic simulator box trainer.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent. * Inability to attend for training and assessment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite measure of flow, handling and respect across five laparoscopic simulator tasksFinal assessment is conducted after a total of 4 hours training timeA proportional odds mixed model of the domains: flow, handling and respect, measured on a 7-level Likert scale for five tasks (peg transfer, suture with extracorproeal knot, suture with intracorporeal knot, precision cutting, and ligating loop) specifying an interaction between arm and task and including participant and rater as random effects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity analyais: Composite measure of flow, handling and respect across five laparoscopic simulator tasksFinal assessment is conducted after a total of 4 hours training timeSensitivity analysis: A linear mixed model of the domains: flow, handling and respect, measured on a 7-level Likert scale for five tasks (peg transfer, suture with extracorproeal knot, suture with intracorporeal knot, precision cutting, and ligating loop) specifying an interaction between arm and task and including participant and rater as random effects.
Flow measure across five laparoscopic simulator tasksFinal assessment is conducted after a total of 4 hours training timeFlow domain measured on a 7-level Likert scale for five tasks (peg transfer, suture with extracorproeal knot, suture with intracorporeal knot, precision cutting, and ligating loop) specifying an interaction between arm and task and including participant and rater as random effects.
Handling measure across five laparoscopic simulator tasksFinal assessment is conducted after a total of 4 hours training timeHandling domain measured on a 7-level Likert scale for five tasks (peg transfer, suture with extracorproeal knot, suture with intracorporeal knot, precision cutting, and ligating loop) specifying an interaction between arm and task and including participant and rater as random effects.
Respect measure across five laparoscopic simulator tasksFinal assessment is conducted after a total of 4 hours training timeRespect domain measured on a 7-level Likert scale for five tasks (peg transfer, suture with extracorproeal knot, suture with intracorporeal knot, precision cutting, and ligating loop) specifying an interaction between arm and task and including participant and rater as random effects.
Qualitative questionnaire and interviewFinal assessment is conducted after a total of 4 hours training timeAt the end of the assessment, all participants will be invited to complete a qualitative questionnaire gathering their feedback on the use of the technology they were randomised to. A small subset of participants will be invited to take part in a qualitative research focus group.

Countries

Guatemala, India, Nigeria

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIREwen M Harrison, PhD

University of Edinburgh

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026