Skip to content

Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Simple Tooth Extraction in Immunosuppressed Patients With Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases

Effectiveness of Short-Course Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Simple Tooth Extraction in Immunosuppressed Patients With Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07275580
Acronym
PRO-EXOD
Enrollment
352
Registered
2025-12-10
Start date
2026-08-20
Completion date
2029-12-30
Last updated
2026-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases, Infection Prevention, Tooth Extraction

Keywords

Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases, Tooth Extraction, Infection Prevention, Amoxicillin, Antibiotic Stewardship, hydroxychroloquine, immunosupressive therapy

Brief summary

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate whether single-dose amoxicillin prophylaxis administered prior to simple tooth extraction reduces postoperative infection rates inpatients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). Although antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for healthy individuals undergoing simple extractions, immunosuppressed ARD patients frequently receive antibiotics despite limited evidence supporting this practice. Secondary objectives include assessing infection severity, postoperative complications, and the impact of ARD diagnosis and immunosuppressive treatment on infection risk.

Detailed description

Simple tooth extractions are common procedures, and postoperative infection rates are low in the general population. Current guidelines discourage prophylactic antibiotic use to reduce microbial resistance, adverse reactions, and microbiome disruption. However, patients with ARDs often receive prophylaxis due to theoretical risks of delayed healing and increased susceptibility to infection. Evidence in other immuno-compromised populations suggests that simple extractions may be safe without antibiotics, but no prospective trials have evaluated this issue specifically in ARD patients. This study is the first prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to determine whether antibiotic prophylaxis is necessary in this population.

Interventions

DRUGAmoxicillin

Amoxicillin 2 g a single prophylactic dose prior to simple extraction.

OTHERPlacebo

Matching placebo tablets administered as a single dose prior to extraction

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Confirmed diagnosis of an ARD: SLE, RA, JIA, AS, PsA, IIM, systemic vasculitis, primary Sjögren's syndrome, or SSc * Use of prednisone and/or at least one synthetic immunosuppressant (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, leflunomide, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, or tacrolimus), immunobiological agent or immunomodulator (chloroquine, sulfasalazine), with no plans to switch medications. * Indication for simple tooth extraction with chronic odontogenic focus * Provided informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals who do not agree to participate in the study will be excluded. * Patients requiring extractions that are more complex from a technical standpoint, such as impacted third molars. * Patients with local or systemic conditions requiring more extensive antibiotic coverage, such as cases with clinical signs of acute infections, patients on anticoagulant therapy, patients with heart disease, patients who have undergone radiation therapy, or patients currently being treated for neoplasms; * Patients allergic to amoxicillin. * Patients currently receiving any antibiotic prophylaxis or treatment; * Patients who have undergone corticosteroid pulse therapy within the last month; * Patients taking drugs with antiresorptive effects on bone, such as oral or injectable bisphosphonates and denosumab.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of postoperative infections7 days post-extractionProportion of participants developing postoperative infection, defined as purulent/serous exudate, fever, or clinical signs of local infection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Postoperative Complications7 days post-extractionPresence of alveolitis, fever, edema, erythema, trismus, exudate, and pain between the two groups
Severity and Duration of Infection7 days post-extractionTo compare the duration and severity of the infection and any possible differences between the two groups
impact of demographic data, different ARDs; disease activity, and treatment7 days post-extractionCompare the potential impact of demographic data, different ARDs; and treatment on the frequency and severity of infection in the two groups;
Oral Health in the different ARDsDay 1Characterize oral health in the different ARDs using the decayed, missing, or filled teeth index (DMF) and the simplified periodontal screening and recording (PSR).

Contacts

CONTACTEloisa Bonfá, Full Professor
eloisa.bonfa@hc.fm.usp.br+55 11 30617492
CONTACTLuciana PC Seguro, PhD
luciana.seguro@hc.fm.usp.br+55 11 999916381
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREloisa Bonfá, Full Professor

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP - HCFMUSP

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 7, 2026