Skip to content

Comparative Study Between Ultrasound Guided Regional Anesthesia for Awake Tympanoplasty Surgery vs General Anesthesia

Safety and Efficacy of Regional Anesthesia for Awake Tympanoplasty Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07275450
Enrollment
128
Registered
2025-12-10
Start date
2025-12-10
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2025-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia , Analgesia, Ultrasound Guided Nerve Block

Keywords

Ultrasound guided regional anesthesia, General anesthesia, Awake tympanoplasty

Brief summary

The aim of this study to evaluate efficacy of ultrasound guided regional anesthesia in performing awake tympanoplasty surgery versus traditional general anesthesia

Detailed description

* To evaluate ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing tympanoplasty as regards: * To assess the time of discharge from post anesthesia care unit * To assess intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, quality of the surgical field and the block success rate (number of patients converted to general anesthesia). * To assess postoperative parameters: Numerical Rating Scale , time to first request of analgesia, postoperative opioid consumption, patient and surgeon satisfaction in both groups. * To assess the incidence of block-related complications (such as nerve injury, hematoma, inadequate block, or local anesthetic toxicity) or surgery related complications as nausea and vomiting

Interventions

PROCEDUREUltrasound-guided regional anesthesia group

patients will receive regional anesthesia using ultrasound guidance. Target nerves (e.g., great auricular nerve, auriculotemporal nerve and lesser occipital nerve) will be identified and anesthetized under real-time ultrasound visualization to ensure accurate needle placement and local anesthetic spread.

OTHERControl group

patients will receive general anesthesia.

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

To evaluate ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing tympanoplasty

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients acceptance 2. Age: 21-65 years old 3. Sex: both sex (males or females). 4. Physical status: American Society Anesthesiologist (ASA) І and II. 5. Patients will be scheduled for elective unilateral tympanoplasty.

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindication of regional anesthesia: Coagulopathy or use of anticoagulant therapy -local infection at the site of injection- known allergy to local anesthetics (bupivacaine). 2. Neurological disorders affecting sensation in the head and neck. 3. Psychiatric illness, severe anxiety, or inability to cooperate during awake surgery. 4. History of previous neck or parotid surgery affecting nerve anatomy. 5. BMI \> 35 (if it may interfere with ultrasound visualization or landmark identification). 6. Pregnancy. 7. Advanced cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic and renal diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The time of discharge from Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)2 hours postoperativeThe time from arrival to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) to the time to discharge to the ward according to modified aldrete score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity by using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)Post Anesthesia Care Unit (0 hour) , 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours and 24 hoursIt is a scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain and 10= worst pain
Block success rate15-20 minutes (from finishing block till start surgery)The number of patients converted to general anesthesia
Quality of surgical fieldduration of surgery (intraoperative)quality of surgical field by Modena Bleeding Score (MBS) is a validated categorical scale designed to measure the quality of the surgical field in relation to bleeding during endoscopic surgery. It features five grades (1= no bleeding, 2= bleeding easily controlled by suction, 3= bleeding that slows surgical procedure, 4= most maneuvers are dedicated to bleeding control and 5= bleeding is so sever that only procedures aimed at controlling bleeding)
Time to first request of analgesia24 hoursTime to first request of analgesia (pethidine)
Intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure0 minute (basal) and every 5 minutes up to 2 hoursIntraoperative changes in mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg)
Patient satisfaction by Likert score24 hourspatient satisfaction by Likert score: The patients will be asked to rate the overall degree of satisfaction of the analgesia by using a 5-points Likert-like verbal scale (1 = very dissatisfied analgesia, 2 = dissatisfied analgesia, and 3 = neutral, 4=satisfied analgesia, and 5=very satisfied analgesia)
Surgeon satisfactionduration of surgery (intraoperative)Surgeon satisfaction by asking the surgeon to rate satisfaction at the end of surgery (4 =excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor, 0=extremely poor)
The incidence of block-related complications or surgery related complications24 hoursTo assess the incidence of block-related complications, such as nerve injury, hematoma, inadequate block, or local anesthetic toxicity or surgery related complications (e.g. nausea and vomiting)
Intraoperative heart rate ( beat per minute)before starting anesthesia 0 minute (basal )and every 5 minutes up to 2 hoursmeasure intraoperative changes in heart rate
Total postoperative analgesic consumption24 hourstotal postoperative pethidine consumption

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactDina Salem, MD
dinamaghraby@yahoo.com0109933513

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026