Skip to content

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Onset of Action of a Topical Anesthetic Marker

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Onset of Action of a Topical Anesthetic Marker

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07273916
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-12-10
Start date
2026-03-31
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain Management

Keywords

anesthetic, analgesic, pain, control, topical

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to to demonstrate the efficacy of a topical anesthetic in reducing pain during the performance of a painful test on the participant's arm. Primary Objective: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and onset of action of the cutaneous marker (Transcutol P+ 20%, Tetracaine 7%, Lidocaine 23%, and dye q.s.), assessed in comparison with a control area without anesthetic. Pain will be induced by light touches with the same pressure using a disposable needle tip on the forearm region, measured by a visual analog scale (VAS) at 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes after application of the marker, in a sample of 20 participants. ● Secondary Objective: To assess safety through the recording 1. Methodology After cleansing the skin of the forearm selected by the participant (right or left), four points will be marked and the study product will be applied. Every 10 minutes, sensitivity at the application site and adjacent skin will be tested through superficial pricks performed with the same pressure in the treated area and the adjacent control area. The participant will be asked whether sensitivity is the same in both areas and will be requested to report the percentual reduction in pain at each studied point. 2. Proposed Evaluation Methods Visual Analog Scale (VAS). 3. Visits / Follow-up Duration The test will be conducted on the proposed area (forearm) during a single visit.

Interventions

DRUGCutaneous marker (Transcutol P+ 20%, Tetracaine 7%, Lidocaine 23%, and dye q.s.),

After cleansing the skin of the forearm selected by the participant (right or left), four points will be marked and the study product will be applied. Every 10 minutes, sensitivity at the application site and adjacent skin will be tested through superficial pricks performed with the same pressure in the treated area and the adjacent control area. The participant will be asked whether sensitivity is the same in both areas and will be requested to report the percentual reduction in pain at each studied point.

Sponsors

Hexsel Dermatology Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Masking description

After cleansing the skin of the forearm selected by the participant (right or left), four points will be marked and the study product will be applied. Every 10 minutes, sensitivity at the application site and adjacent skin will be tested through superficial pricks performed with the same pressure in the treated area and the adjacent control area. The participant will be asked whether sensitivity is the same in both areas and will be requested to report the percentual reduction in pain at each studied point.

Intervention model description

Prospective, interventional, self-controlled clinical study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age above 18 years. 2. Willingness and ability to undergo the procedures described in the protocol. 3. Candidates who understand and sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) upon study entry, prior to any study-related procedures.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or breastfeeding on the day of the study. 2. History of sensitivity to topical anesthetics or any component of the anesthetic marker formulation. 3. Symptoms of infection at the application site. 4. Eczema or skin alterations at the application site. 5. Any other active inflammations or infections in the treated areas. 6. Any surgical procedure performed that may have affected the area to be assessed in this study. 7. Severe psychiatric disorders. 8. Any other uncontrolled chronic or serious medical condition which, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the interpretation of the clinical study results or place the participant at significant risk. 9. Use of analgesic medications. 10. Vulnerable groups (such as individuals deprived of liberty) as defined in Section 1.61 of the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines. 11. Participation in any other clinical drug or device study and/or participation within 7 days prior to Day 1 of this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain control1 dayTo evaluate, record, and compare mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 10-minute intervals, with time 0 corresponding to product application and the first assessment occurring 10 minutes after application, followed by measurements at 20, 30, and 40 minutes. Assessments will be performed on the left or right forearm according to the participant's preference, using light punctures in the area where the product was applied and comparing results to an adjacent control area.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to analgesic effect1 dayOnset of analgesic effect, defined as the first clinically relevant reduction in VAS pain scores following product application. ● Difference in pain scores between puncture points in the untreated control area and the treated area, assessed at the same time points.

Contacts

Primary ContactDoris Hexsel, Dr
pesquisa@hexsel.com.br+5551994840578

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026