Skip to content

Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol as Induction Agents for Electroconvulsive Therapy

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Propofol and Ketofol for Hemodynamic Stability During Electroconvulsive Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07273851
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-12-10
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2025-12-10
Last updated
2025-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Propofol Ketofol Electroconvulsive Therapy Anesthesia Hemodynamic Stability

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial will compare two anesthetic agents, propofol and ketofol (a combination of propofol and ketamine), in patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Propofol is commonly used but may lower blood pressure, while ketofol may help maintain more stable cardiovascular function. The study will evaluate changes in systolic blood pressure following ECT when either propofol or ketofol is used for anesthesia induction. A total of 80 adult patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Findings may guide anesthesiologists in selecting the safest and most effective induction agent for ECT.

Detailed description

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an established treatment for depression and other psychiatric disorders that do not respond to medications. The procedure requires short-term anesthesia. Propofol is the most commonly used drug for anesthesia during ECT because it acts quickly and allows patients to recover rapidly, but it is often linked with low blood pressure and shorter seizure duration. Ketamine, another anesthetic drug, increases blood pressure and heart rate and may prolong seizures, but it is rarely used alone because of side effects such as agitation. A newer approach is to combine both drugs, known as ketofol, to balance their effects. This study will directly compare propofol and ketofol as induction agents during ECT, with a focus on how each affects systolic blood pressure. Eighty adult patients scheduled for ECT will be randomly assigned to receive either propofol or ketofol for anesthesia. Blood pressure will be measured before and after the procedure, and additional information such as seizure duration, recovery time, and side effects will be recorded. The results will provide evidence on whether ketofol offers better hemodynamic stability than propofol alone, potentially improving safety during ECT.

Interventions

DRUGPropofol

Intravenous induction agent administered before electroconvulsive therapy. Participants in this arm will receive IV propofol 1 mg/kg as a single slow bolus immediately before ECT under continuous ECG, pulse oximetry, and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring. Premedication with glycopyrrolate 0.004 mg/kg IV will be given to all patients. Ringer's lactate infusion will begin prior to induction. After loss of eyelash reflex, ECT will be performed using bifrontotemporal electrodes. Systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation will be recorded at baseline and 20 minutes after shock delivery. The patient will be ventilated with 100 % oxygen until spontaneous breathing resumes.

Intravenous admixture prepared immediately before induction by combining equal parts of ketamine and propofol in the same syringe. Participants will receive propofol 0.5 mg/kg + ketamine 0.5 mg/kg as a slow IV bolus immediately before ECT. Continuous ECG, pulse oximetry, and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring will be maintained. Premedication and procedural steps are identical to the propofol arm. The rationale is that ketamine's sympathetic stimulation counterbalances the hypotensive effect of propofol, potentially improving hemodynamic stability during ECT. Hemodynamic variables and seizure duration will be documented at baseline, during, and 20 minutes after shock delivery. Patients will receive 100 % oxygen ventilation until spontaneous respiration resumes.

Sponsors

Fauji Foundation Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18-65 years Both genders ASA physical status I-II Scheduled for electroconvulsive therapy

Exclusion criteria

* History of chronic opioid therapy Pregnancy Known allergy or hypersensitivity to propofol or ketamine History of cardiovascular disease History of renal disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure 20 Minutes After Electroconvulsive Therapy20 minutes after seizure stimulus during the index ECT sessionSystolic blood pressure (SBP) will be recorded 20 minutes after the delivery of electrical stimulus in both study groups using a non-invasive blood pressure monitor. Baseline SBP will also be recorded prior to induction. The mean SBP between propofol and ketofol groups will be compared to determine the effect of anesthetic agent on post-ECT hemodynamic stability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seizure DurationImmediately following ECTDuration of the ECT-induced seizure will be measured in seconds using EEG tracing or motor observation from the time of electrical stimulus until cessation of seizure activity.
Recovery TimeUp to 30 minutes after ECTTime in minutes from the completion of ECT to spontaneous respiration and recovery of consciousness (Aldrete score ≥ 9) will be recorded to assess recovery profile.
Heart Rate at 20 Minutes Post-ECT20 minutes post-ECTHeart rate will be measured at baseline, immediately after ECT, and 20 minutes post-shock to compare cardiovascular response between the two groups.
Oxygen Saturation (SpO₂)Baseline, intra-procedure, and up to 30 minutes post-ECTMinimum oxygen saturation will be monitored continuously using pulse oximetry and recorded to identify any desaturation episodes during and after ECT.
Adverse EventsIntraoperative period and recovery up to 30 minutes post-ECTAny adverse event such as nausea, vomiting, arrhythmia, emergence agitation, or hallucination will be recorded and compared between the two study arms.
Incidence of HypotensionFrom induction until 30 minutes post-ECTThe occurrence of hypotension (defined as a ≥20% decrease from baseline mean arterial pressure) during or after ECT will be documented and compared between groups.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026