Skip to content

Effect of HIIT on Post-Stroke Fatigue

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention on Post-Stroke Fatigue in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07273058
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-12-09
Start date
2025-10-15
Completion date
2027-10-01
Last updated
2025-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on fatigue severity among individuals with chronic stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned to the HIIT group, the moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) group, or the stretching group (active control). Each group will participate in supervised exercise sessions three times per week over a 12-week period, totaling 36 sessions. Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (week 6), post-intervention (week 12), and follow-up (week 20). The primary outcome will be fatigue severity. Secondary outcomes will include inflammatory biomarkers and additional health-related indicators.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHIIT

The HIIT intervention will consist of a 3-minute warm-up, a 25-minute main exercise, and a 2-minute cool-down. The main exercise will include four 4-minute high-intensity intervals, each interspersed with a 3-minute low-intensity recovery period. Participants will attend three supervised sessions per week over a 12-week period.

BEHAVIORALMICT

The MICT intervention will include a 3-minute warm-up, 25 minutes of continuous exercise performed at a moderate intensity, and a 2-minute cool-down. Participants will attend three supervised sessions per week over a 12-week period.

BEHAVIORALstretching

The stretching intervention will consist of 30 minutes of whole-body stretching. Participants will attend three sessions per week over a 12-week period.

Sponsors

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age of 40-80 years; * a history of ischemic stroke resulting in unilateral limb impairment 6-60 months prior to consent to participate in the pilot trial; * a stable medical condition; * a subjective feeling of fatigue, defined as a period of apparent fatigue, decreased energy, increased need for rest, or fatigue out of proportion to physical activity for at least 2 weeks during the past month; * ability to communicate with the investigators and lack of significant cognitive deficits; * able to walk for 10 meters with or without a walking aid.

Exclusion criteria

* An FSS score of \< 4 (20); * other neurological conditions; * other musculoskeletal comorbidities that would prevent safe participation in exercises; * a medical diagnosis of significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease(s); * signs or symptoms indicative of significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease(s) during the previous 3 months; * severe lower limb spasticity (Ashworth Scale score ≥ 3); * Botulinum toxin use in the affected lower limb within the past six months; * current or previous use of drugs intended to resolve post-stroke fatigue; * active engagement in other stroke rehabilitation trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Eligibility rate (%)Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks.
Acceptability (qualitative)At week 12
Adverse events (number of events)From baseline to week 12
Retention of the intervention (%)From baseline to week 12
Fidelity to the HIIT protocol (%)From baseline to week 12
Compliance with HIIT (%)From baseline to week 12
Recruitment rate (number of participants per month)Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MDI)Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess fatigue across five dimensions: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, Reduced Motivation, and Reduced Activity. Each subscale contains 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue. The total score ranges from 20 to 100.
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.The FSS consists of 9 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (highly disagree) to 7 (highly agree). Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity.
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 6, and week 12.The SF-36 includes 36 items and one additional item assessing perceived change in health over time. Each domain is scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.
Inflammatory biomarkersBlinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 6, and week 12.Inflammatory biomarkers will be quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits obtained from commercial suppliers, following the manufacturer's instructions.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ)Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.The SSEQ is a 13-item self-report scale assessing stroke survivors' confidence in performing daily activities and managing post-stroke challenges. Each item is rated from 0 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident). Total score ranges from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.The PSQI is consists of 19 items grouped into seven components. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, yielding a global score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality.
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MiniBEST)Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.The Mini-BESTest consists of 14 items, including the Timed Up and Go test, with a maximum total score of 28 points. Higher scores indicate better balance performance.
Behavioral Regulation In Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at week 1, week 12, and week 20.The BREQ-2 includes 19 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not true for me) to 4 (very true for me). Higher scores reflect higher exercise motivation.
Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PAES)Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at week 6 and at week 12.The PAES will be used to measure the participants' exercise enjoyment (score range: 0-56). A high score indicates a high level of activity enjoyment.
6-Minute Walk TestBlinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.Walking endurance will be assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test. The participants will be allowed to use assistive devices, which will be documented and kept consistent across all of the time points.
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.The SPPB comprises three components: balance tests (including side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem stances), a gait speed test, and a five-times sit-to-stand test. Each component is scored on a scale from 0 to 4, with a total possible score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate better physical performance.
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment-Lower ExtremityBlinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.To assess motor recovery, Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment-Lower Extremity will be used, it score rangefrom 0 to 34; a high score is indicative of good motor recovery
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.The HADS consists of 14 items, divided into two subscales: anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D), each containing 7 items. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3), resulting in subscale scores ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety or depression.

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

Primary ContactMei Zhen Prof. Huang
mei-zhen.huang@polyu.edu.hk+852 00000000
Backup ContactFong Sze Chung
fschung@polyu.edu.hk

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026