Skip to content

NAFF Arabic Validation Study

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare (NAFF) Questionnaire Among Arabic-speaking Adults With Diabetes in Tunisia

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07271550
Enrollment
255
Registered
2025-12-09
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2021-11-30
Last updated
2025-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Behavior, Diabetic Foot Disease, Questionnaire and Survey, Self Care, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate a new Arabic version of the NAFF questionnaire, which measures foot care behaviors in adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants are adults with type 2 diabetes who will complete the questionnaire online. The study will assess how reliable and valid the Arabic version is, helping healthcare providers identify risky foot care behaviors and improve patient education.

Detailed description

This study is a cross-sectional validation of the NAFF questionnaire translated into Arabic. Adult patients with type 2 diabetes will be recruited from endocrinology outpatient clinic in Sousse. Participants will complete the Arabic NAFF online. Primary outcomes include assessment of reliability (internal consistency, test-retest) and validity (construct and criterion validity). Secondary outcomes include the relationship between foot care behaviors and demographic or clinical factors. All participants will provide informed consent electronically. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Sousse. Data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic NAFF..

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine, Sousse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
26 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus * Age 26-65 years * Ability to read and understand Arabic * Receiving regular follow-up care at the endocrinology outpatient clinic

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairments affecting comprehension or self-care activities * Physical disabilities hindering self-care activities * Presence of active foot ulcers at time of enrollment * Bilateral lower-limb amputations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Translation and adaptation01/06/ 2021-31/07/ 2021 (2 months)Translation, cultural adaptation, and assessment of content validity through expert panel evaluation using a 4-point relevance scale. Content validity index calculated by dividing items rated 3-4 by total items (n=29). Values ≥0.80 considered acceptable.
Descriptive data01/08/2021 to 28/11/2021 (4 months)Participants were asked to complete the NAFF-A questionnaire in the waiting room before clinical consultation. Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records in collaboration with attending physicians, including gender, age, educational level, residence, diabetes duration, HbA1c levels, and history of ulceration or amputation.
Test-Retest Reliability of NAFF-A (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient)Test-retest interval of 10-14 days between initial assessment and follow-up assessment.Assessment of temporal stability of the NAFF-A using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between test and retest administrations. Values ≥0.70 indicate good reliability, with higher values indicating better temporal stability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Internal consistencyAt the end of data collectionAssessment of internal consistency reliability of the Arabic version of the Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Acceptable range is 0.70-0.95, with higher values indicating better internal consistency.
Criterion Validity - Correlation with Ulceration Risk StratificationAt the end of data collectionSpearman's correlation coefficient between NAFF-A total scores and ulceration risk grades (0-3 scale based on IWGDF guidelines). Negative correlation expected as better foot care behaviors should be associated with lower ulceration risk.
Criterion Validity - Correlation with Educational LevelAt the end of data collectionSpearman's correlation coefficient between NAFF-A total scores and participant educational level (primary, secondary, university). Positive correlation expected based on literature showing higher education associated with better self-care behaviors.
Criterion Validity - Correlation with HbA1c LevelsAt the end of data collectionSpearman's correlation coefficient between NAFF-A total scores and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Negative correlation expected as better foot care behaviors should be associated with better glycemic control.

Countries

Tunisia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026