Skip to content

Sublingual Misoprostol Versus No Cervical Priming Before Hysteroscopic Resection of Symptomatic Uterine Niches

Sublingual Misoprostol Versus No Cervical Priming Before Hysteroscopic Resection of Symptomatic Uterine Niches: Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07271056
Enrollment
56
Registered
2025-12-08
Start date
2025-02-11
Completion date
2025-10-30
Last updated
2025-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Cesarean Section Complications, Scar Niche

Keywords

Misoprostol, Administration, Sublingual, Cervical Priming, Hysteroscopy, Cesarean Section Scar Defect, Randomized Controlled Trial, Postmenstrual Spotting

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluated whether preoperative sublingual misoprostol can enhance the effectiveness and safety of niche resection in patients with symptomatic uterine niche.

Detailed description

After eligibility and consenting, Participants with symptomatic uterine niche were randomized (1:1) to sublingual misoprostol or placebo. Baseline demographic and clinical variables (age, BMI, number of prior cesarean section, number of days of postmenstrual spotting, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dysuria) were collected. Symptom severity was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 1-10). Baseline niche characteristics (residual myometrial thickness, depth, length, and width) were measured by saline infusion sonohysterography. The misoprostol group received 200 µg sublingual misoprostol tablet two hours before surgery; controls received identical placebo tablets. Hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche was performed around cycle day 10 under spinal or general anesthesia using a 9-mm resectoscope with monopolar energy and 3.5% sorbitol for uterine distension. Misoprostol-related adverse events (cramping, fever, GI upset) were recorded preoperatively by a trained nurse. The Sanders and Murji technique was adapted as follow: (1) anatomical orientation, (2) cephalic rim resection, (3) caudal rim resection, and (4) rollerball ablation of the niche base . Intraoperative data (duration, need for dilators, intra- and postoperative complications). At 3 months postoperatively, participants were reassessed for reduction in number of days of postmenstrual spotting, changes in pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dysuria (VAS scores), participants satisfaction (satisfied/very satisfied vs. dissatisfied/neutral), , and sonohysterographic niche measurements (RMT, depth, length, width). The participants, hysteroscopist, outcome assessors, and the investigator were blinded for the assignment of the participants to either groups.

Interventions

Misoprostol group received 200 µg sublingual misoprostol tablet two hours before hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche. A trained nurse, independent of assessment, prepared and administered the medication to the participants.

Placebo group received sublingual identical tablet two hours before hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche. A trained nurse, independent of assessment, prepared and administered the tab to the participants.

PROCEDUREHysteroscopic resection of uterine niche

Procedures were performed around cycle day 10 under spinal or general anesthesia using a 9-mm resectoscope (Karl Storz, Germany) with monopolar energy and 3.5% sorbitol for uterine distension. The Sanders and Murji technique was adapted as follow: (1) anatomical orientation, (2) cephalic rim resection, (3) caudal rim resection, and (4) rollerball ablation of the niche base.

All participants were evaluated by a single blinded sonographer experienced in niche assessment. First, transvaginal ultrasound was performed to exclude pregnancy or pelvic pathology, followed by saline-infusion sonohysterography (2D, sagittal and coronal views). A niche was defined as ≥ 2 mm myometrial indentation at the scar site. Niche depth, length, width, and residual myometrial thickness were recorded.

Sponsors

Benha University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥1 previous cesarean section * Post cesarean section uterine niche confirmed by saline infusion sonohysterography (niche depth ≥2 mm) * Residual myometrial thickness ≥2.5 mm as confirmed by saline infusion sonohysterography * Regular cycles * Abnormal uterine bleeding for ≥3 consecutive cycles * Post menstrual spotting or brownish discharge ≥2 days * Total monthly bleeding duration \>7 days

Exclusion criteria

* Irregular cycles * Amenorrhea * Abnormal cervical cytology * Acute or chronic cervicitis * Pelvic inflammatory disease * Endometrial polyps * Uterine fibroids * Contraindications to spinal or general anesthesia * Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction in number of days of postmenstrual spotting.At 3 months postoperative.The number of days of postmenstrual spotting was recorded at baseline and 3 months post hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pelvic pain scoreAt baseline and at 3 months postoperative.Pain was assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants mark a point on the line that represents their pain,giving that 0 means no pain and 10 means worst pain imaginable. The clinician measures the distance (in centimeters or millimeters) from 0 to the patient's mark and that number is the VAS pain score.
Dysmenorrhea scoreAt baseline and at 3 months postoperative.Pain was assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants mark a point on the line that represents their pain,giving that 0 means no pain and 10 means worst pain imaginable. The clinician measures the distance (in centimeters or millimeters) from 0 to the patient's mark and that number is the VAS pain score.
Dyspareunia scoreAt baseline and at 3 months postoperative.Pain was assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants mark a point on the line that represents their pain,giving that 0 means no pain and 10 means worst pain imaginable. The clinician measures the distance (in centimeters or millimeters) from 0 to the patient's mark and that number is the VAS pain score.
Total bleeding days per cycleAt baseline and at 3 months postoperative.Total bleeding days per cycle was recorded at baseline and 3 months post hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche.
Satisfaction with the outcomeAt 3 months postoperative.Participant satisfaction with the outcome was assessed using a binary scale (Yes when satisfied/very satisfied , No when dissatisfied/neutral).
Uterine niche measurementsAt baseline and at 3 months postoperative.First, transvaginal ultrasound was performed to exclude pregnancy or pelvic pathology, followed by saline-infusion sonohysterography (2D, sagittal and coronal views). A niche was defined as ≥ 2 mm myometrial indentation at the scar site. Niche depth, length, width, and residual myometrial thickness were recorded.
Dysuria scoreAt baseline and at 3 months postoperative.Pain was assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants mark a point on the line that represents their pain,giving that 0 means no pain and 10 means worst pain imaginable. The clinician measures the distance (in centimeters or millimeters) from 0 to the patient's mark and that number is the VAS pain score.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026