FindTrial
Sign In

Assesment of Tempromandibular Joint ( TMJ ) Changes After Treatment of Skeletal Class II Cases by Twinblock vs Monoblock Appliances

Assessment of Tempromandibular Joint Changes After Treatment of Skeletal Class II Growing Patients by Twin Block Versus Monoblock

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07270653
Enrollment
18
Registered
2025-12-08
Start date
2023-08-15
Completion date
2025-11-11
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skeletal Class II Malocclusion

Brief summary

Assesment of TMJ changes after treatment of skeletal classII growing patients by Twinblock vs Mono block applinces

Detailed description

Group (A): patients were treated by Twin block appliance Group (B): patients were treated by Mono block appliance

Interventions

DEVICEtwin block

Treatment of Skeletal class II by mandibular advancement using twinblock appliances ( removable myofunctional appliance)

DEVICEMono block

Treatment of Skeletal class II by mandibular advancement using Mono block appliances ( removable myofunctional appliance)

Sponsors

Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
9 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* skeletal class II malocclusion * Defecient mandible * ANB \>4 * Growing female patients * Age from 9-12 years

Exclusion criteria

* TMJ disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Tempromandibular changes including, condylar volume ( in cubic millimeters), length ( in millimeters) , height ( in millimeters) and position( in millimeters)8-12 monthsfull skull CBCT

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026