Skip to content

Comparative Study of Two Infraclavicular Block Approaches in Forearm Surgery

A Comparative Study of Retroclavicular and Classical Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks Using 0.5% Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Forearm Surgery.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07269678
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-12-08
Start date
2025-03-22
Completion date
2025-09-20
Last updated
2025-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Procedure Time

Brief summary

It is hypothesized that retro clavicular Infraclavicular brachial plexus block is better than classical coracoid Infraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing forearm surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURERetroclavicular infraclavicular brachial plexus block

The retro clavicular approach to the Infraclavicular brachial plexus block will be performed by placing probe parasagittally just medial to the coracoid process and caudal from the clavicle. The needle insertion point was located in the supraclavicular fossa, just medial to the shoulder at a point sufficiently posterior to the clavicle and medial to the trapezius muscle insertion point on the clavicle. The needle will be inserted immediately above the clavicle in the space between the coracoid process and the clavicle and advanced from cephalad to caudal.

PROCEDUREClassic coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block

The coracoid approach to the Infraclavicular brachial plexus block will be performed by placing the ultrasound probe parasagittally just medial to the coracoid process and caudal from the clavicle. The needle will be inserted cephalad to the ultrasound probe using an in-plane technique and advanced in a caudal direction toward the posterior aspect of the axillary artery, in the vicinity of the posterior cord of the brachial plexus.

Sponsors

Sargodha Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients from 18-60 years. 2. Male Patients 3. Elective forearm surgery 4. BMI ≤30kg/m2 5. American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Physical Status ≤III

Exclusion criteria

1. History of known allergy or hypersensitivity against study drug. 2. Previous surgery on the same limb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1 onset of motor block.IntraoperativelyOnset of motor block assess using modified bromage scale Score Grade of motor blockade(Modified bromage scale) 0 Normal muscle function with full range of movement of elbow, wrist and fingers . 1 Decreased muscle power so that patient can move fingers and /or wrist only 2. Complete loss of muscle function with no movement in fingers/wrist
Onset of sensory BlockIntraoperatively lOnset of sensory block assess using pin prick method Grade of sensory blockade Score 1. Feeling sharp pinprick (no block) 0 2. Blunt sensation on pinprick (partial block 1 3. No sensation on pinprick (complete block) 2
Block adequate for surgeryIntraoperativelyBlock adequate for surgery when there is no need for local infiltration and general anesthesia
Needle Shadow and shaft visibility using 5 point likert scale.IntraoperativelyNEEDLE SHADOW VISIBILITY 5-POINT LIKERT SCALE SCORE Needle tip visibility 1. Very poor 2. Poor 3. Fair 4. Good 5. Very good 5-POINT LIKERT SCALE SCORE Needle Shaft visibility 1. None of the shaft visualized 2. Only a small segment of the shaft visualized 3. Less than half of the shaft visualized 4. Almost all of the shaft visualized 5. The entire shaft visualized

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ComplicationIntraoperativelyVascular puncture and pneumothorax
Procedure TimeIntraoperativelyTime from insertion of needle to removal of needle
Rescue anesthesia requirementIntraoperatively after regional blockRescue anesthesia given when block is not adequate for surgery such as local infiltration and general anesthesia

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026