Skip to content

Vein Wrapping in Peripheral Nerve Injury Repair Below The Elbow

Vein Wrapping in Peripheral Nerve Injury Repair Below The Elbow .

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07267663
Enrollment
43
Registered
2025-12-05
Start date
2025-12-31
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nerve Injury Repair

Keywords

Vein Wrapping

Brief summary

Peripheral nerve injuries are common after trauma and may cause pain, sensory loss, motor deficit, and long-term disability. Scar formation and perineural adhesion at the repair site interfere with axonal regeneration, impair gliding of the nerve within surrounding tissues, and are main contributors to painful neuroma formation and persistent functional deficits. After peripheral nerve injury or incomplete regeneration, disorganized axonal sprouting and connective tissue proliferation at the proximal nerve end can result in a traumatic neuroma. This structure is characterized by tangled axons, Schwann cells, and fibrous tissue, leading to pain, hypersensitivity, and impaired function. Neuromas often develop when regenerating axons cannot reconnect with their distal targets, typically due to excessive scar formation or tension at the repair site.Scar tissue not only obstructs regenerating axons but also mechanically tethers the nerve, resulting in traction neuritis and painful hypersensitivity. Autologous vein wrapping in which a segment of the patient's own vein is placed around the repaired nerve has been shown to reduce perineural scarring and neuroma formation by acting as both a mechanical barrier and a biological conduit. The vein sheath isolates the nerve from surrounding fibrotic tissue, while its inner endothelial surface supports axonal guidance and nutrient diffusion. Experimental studies have demonstrated improved axonal regeneration, reduced collagen deposition, and better functional recovery when vein wrapping is used compared to simple neurorrhaphy. Clinical studies have also reported favorable outcomes with vein wrapping, particularly in preventing recurrent or painful neurom. It is a simple, cost-effective, and autologous technique that avoids immune reaction or foreign body response. Patients treated with vein wrapping often show reduced neuropathic pain and improved sensory recovery. Clinically, Tinel's sign (Hoffmann-Tinel test) is widely used as a simple bedside test to detect regenerating axons advancing along a nerve or to localize symptomatic neuromas. A progressive distal-to-proximal Tinel's sign often indicates advancing regeneration, whereas a static or painful Tinel's sign at the repair or nerve ends may indicate neuroma-in-continuity or symptomatic end neuroma. Because it is easy to perform and commonly recorded in clinical follow-up, Tinel's sign is an appropriate secondary outcome to assess the presence of symptomatic neuroma or nerve regeneration after vein-wrapped repairs. Therefore, this study aims to systematically evaluate the effect of autologous vein wrapping on neuroma formation, functional recovery, and associated clinical signs, such as Tinel's sign, in patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injuries.

Interventions

PROCEDUREnerve repair

The nerve ends are repaired using a standard epineural microsuture technique (usually 8-0 or 9-0 nylon). Tension-free coaptation is ensured.

PROCEDUREvien Wrapping

The vein is wrapped loosely around the nerve repair site without any tension. The edges are sutured with a few fine 8-0 or 9-0 nylon stitches.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18-60 years with traumatic peripheral nerve injury requiring surgical repair. * Nerve injury distal to the elbow. * Time from injury to surgical repair less than 6 months .

Exclusion criteria

* Injury proximal to the elbow. * Children below 18. * History of multiple comorbidities (e.g., diabetes+another chronic illness)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of neuroma formation12 months postoperativelyassessed by high-resolution ultrasonography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction and functional scores (DASH).12 monthsPatient satisfaction and functional scores (DASH).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026