Computed Tomography
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to assess the performance of Precise 3D Surview on CT 5300 and Incisive CT Scanners as compared with manual annotation by experienced CT technologists. * To evaluate the acceptance rate of the Auto 3D Planning Box compared with manual annotation by experienced CT technologists. * To evaluate the acceptance rate of the Auto Suggestion for Locator compared with manual annotation by experienced CT technologists. * To evaluate the acceptance rate of the Auto Planning for Truncated Anatomies (lung and liver) compared with manual annotation by experienced CT technologists. * To evaluate the acceptance rate of Auto Planning and Symmetry Correction for Tilted Head compared with manual annotation by experienced CT technologists.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Philips Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global
Study design
Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects scanned by CT 5300 (K232491) and Incisive CT (K212441) according to the department standard of care clinical protocols. * Subjects age is over eighteen (18) years1. * Patients scanned in supine orientation. * Non-contrast CT scan * CT scan with standard resolution
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects age is under or equal 18 years old * Patients are not scanned in supine orientation. * Contrast-enhanced CT scans. * CT scans with high resolution * Scans that are not completed due to technical difficulties
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Acceptance rate of the 3D Surview | Reading session at 4 months |
Outcome results
None listed