Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Leymovir Versus Valganciclovir in Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Cytomegalovirus Disease in Chinese Kidney Transplant Recipients

Efficacy and Safety of Leymovir Versus Valganciclovir in Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Cytomegalovirus Disease in Chinese Kidney Transplant Recipients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07266467
Acronym
CAPS01
Enrollment
290
Registered
2025-12-05
Start date
2025-05-13
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2025-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Transplant

Keywords

Kidney Transplant, cytomegalovirus, letemovir, valganciclovir, Randomized control

Brief summary

the existing anti-CMV drugs mainly include valganciclovir, ganciclovir and foscarnet sodium, all of which act on DNA polymerase (pUL54), making them prone to cross resistance. DNA synthesis in normal cell is also catalyzed by DNA polymerase, which can also inhibit normal cell production, especially in metabolically active bone marrow cells, leading to bone marrow suppression. In addition, these drugs are mainly metabolized by the kidneys, causing damage to proximal renal tubular cells. Therefore, it is necessary to closely monitor the patient's renal function and adjust the dosage. Overall, the medical demand for effective and well-tolerated treatment methods for CMV infection management in kidney transplant recipients remains unmet, and safer anti-CMV drugs are urgently needed. The target of letemovir is the CMV DNA terminal enzyme complex, which is different from the target of existing anti-CMV drugs, and does not exhibit cross resistance. Moreover, this target does not have a corresponding substance in mammalian cells and does not exhibit toxicity similar to DNA polymerase targets. In addition, letemovir is mainly metabolized by the liver, and urinary excretion can be ignored (\<2% dose), so there is no need to adjust the dose according to renal function. Phase III registered clinical studies abroad have shown that letemovir is not inferior to valganciclovir in preventing CMV disease in kidney transplant recipients. Additionally, letemovir is safer and has a lower incidence of adverse reactions, especially leukopenia or granulocytopenia. However, there is still a lack of data on the use of kidney transplantation in Chinese population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of letamovir in preventing CMV infection and CMV disease in kidney transplant recipients in China.

Detailed description

the existing anti-CMV drugs mainly include valganciclovir, ganciclovir and foscarnet sodium, all of which act on DNA polymerase (pUL54), making them prone to cross resistance. DNA synthesis in normal cell is also catalyzed by DNA polymerase, which can also inhibit normal cell production, especially in metabolically active bone marrow cells, leading to bone marrow suppression. In addition, these drugs are mainly metabolized by the kidneys, causing damage to proximal renal tubular cells. Therefore, it is necessary to closely monitor the patient's renal function and adjust the dosage. Overall, the medical demand for effective and well-tolerated treatment methods for CMV infection management in kidney transplant recipients remains unmet, and safer anti-CMV drugs are urgently needed. The target of letemovir is the CMV DNA terminal enzyme complex, which is different from the target of existing anti-CMV drugs, and does not exhibit cross resistance. Moreover, this target does not have a corresponding substance in mammalian cells and does not exhibit toxicity similar to DNA polymerase targets. In addition, letemovir is mainly metabolized by the liver, and urinary excretion can be ignored (\<2% dose), so there is no need to adjust the dose according to renal function. Phase III registered clinical studies abroad have shown that letemovir is not inferior to valganciclovir in preventing CMV disease in kidney transplant recipients. Additionally, letemovir is safer and has a lower incidence of adverse reactions, especially leukopenia or granulocytopenia. However, there is still a lack of data on the use of kidney transplantation in Chinese population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of letamovir in preventing CMV infection and CMV disease in kidney transplant recipients in China.

Interventions

DRUGLetermovir

Drug name: Letermovir.

DRUGValganciclovir

Valganciclovir.

Sponsors

Chinese People's Liberation Army Northern Theater Command General Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The First Hospital of Jilin University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
CollaboratorOTHER
Qianfo Mountain Hospital, Shandong Province
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Eastern Theater General Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Shu lan Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tongji Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
RenJi Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tsinghua Changgeng Hospital, Beijing
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- 1) Age ≥18 years old, gender unlimited. 2) Receiving the first kidney transplant. 3) Be within 0 (ie, day of transplantation) to 7 days (inclusive) post-kidney transplant at the time of randomization. 4\) Obtain informed consent signed .

Exclusion criteria

* 1)Received a previous solid organ transplant or HSCT. 2)Is a multi-organ transplant recipient (eg, kidney-pancreas). Note: Double kidney transplant recipients (ie, transplant of two kidneys from the same donor to the same recipient simultaneously) will be excluded. 3)Has a history of CMV disease or suspected CMV disease within 6 months prior to randomization. 4)Has evidence of CMV viremia at any time from the signing of the ICF or the transplant procedure until the randomization period; 5)Has suspected or known hypersensitivity to active or inactive ingredients of LET formulations, VGCV, GCV, formulations. 6)Is on dialysis or plasmapheresis at the time of randomization. Note: For the purposes of this protocol, dialysis includes hemofiltration. Participant who: (1) has had dialysis or plasmapheresis within 7 days (inclusive) post-transplant but is not on dialysis or plasmapheresis at the time of randomization; and (2) is expected to remain off dialysis or plasmapheresis may be enrolled, provided that all other inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of CMV disease at 52 weeks after transplantation52 weeks after transplantationProportion of subjects diagnosed with CMV disease at week 52 after transplantation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of CMV disease at 14/24 weeks after transplantation14/24 weeks after transplantionProportion of subjects diagnosed with CMV disease at week 14/26 after transplantation.
Time of CMV onset 52 weeks after transplantation52 weeks after transplantationFrom the day of transplant to the first diagnosis of CMV disease.
Incidence of CMV DNaemia at 14/26/52 weeks after transplantation14/24/52 weeks after transplantionProportion of subjects diagnosed with CMV DNaemia at week 14/26/52 after transplantation.
Incidence and severity of all adverse events52 weeks after transplantationProportion of subjects with any AE that occurred from the time the study intervention was assigned to 14 days after the study intervention was terminated. Saes will only be reported 14 days after stopping the study intervention until week 52 after transplantation.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiaoming Ding
xmding1970@163.com+86 13991238632
Backup ContactYihan Wang
1142899697@qq.com+86 18691562978

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026