Skip to content

PRF and CGF Scaffolds With EDTA in Regeneration

Current Regenerative Approaches Applied to Immature Teeth With Necrotic Pulps

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07265804
Acronym
RET-EDTA-CGF
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-12-05
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-10-01
Last updated
2025-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immature Permanent Teeth, Open Apex, Periapical Periodontitis, Procedure, Pulp Necrosis

Keywords

Regenerative Endodontics, Platelet-Rich Fibrin, Concentrated Growth Factor, Blood Clot Scaffold, EDTA Irrigation

Brief summary

This study evaluated the regenerative outcomes of immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulps treated using three scaffold types-blood clot, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and concentrated growth factor (CGF)-combined with either 5% or 17% EDTA as the final irrigant. Thirty teeth were randomly assigned to six treatment groups and followed clinically and radiographically for 12 months. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to assess root development parameters, including root length increase, apical diameter change, hard tissue formation, and periapical lesion volume. Clinical assessments included pain, swelling, sinus tract formation, percussion sensitivity, and pulp sensitivity testing. The study aimed to determine whether different scaffold materials and EDTA concentrations influence regenerative healing responses in immature necrotic teeth.

Detailed description

This prospective randomized clinical study investigated regenerative endodontic treatment approaches for immature permanent teeth diagnosed with pulp necrosis and associated periapical pathology. Thirty teeth were allocated into six treatment subgroups based on two variables: scaffold type (blood clot, platelet-rich fibrin \[PRF\], or concentrated growth factor \[CGF\]) and final irrigation protocol (5% EDTA or 17% EDTA). All procedures were performed using a standardized regenerative protocol that included sodium hypochlorite irrigation, intracanal antibiotic medication, induction of apical bleeding when applicable, placement of the assigned scaffold, coronal sealing with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and final composite restoration. Radiographic evaluation involved cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at baseline and 12 months to measure root length development, apical diameter changes, hard tissue formation, and volumetric alterations in periapical lesions. Periapical radiographs were taken at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months to complement CBCT findings. Clinical follow-up included assessment of symptoms such as pain, swelling, sinus tract presence, tenderness to percussion, and pulp sensitivity using cold testing and electric pulp testing. The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of scaffold type and EDTA concentration on the biological and radiographic outcomes of regenerative endodontic treatment. The study sought to clarify how these variables may influence root maturation, apical closure, pulp vitality responses, and periapical tissue healing within a regenerative framework. This research was designed to contribute to the optimization of clinical protocols for managing immature teeth with necrotic pulps.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBlood Clot + 5% EDTA

Final irrigation with 5% EDTA followed by induction of apical bleeding to form an intracanal blood clot scaffold as part of the regenerative endodontic procedure.

PROCEDUREBlood Clot + 17% EDTA

Final irrigation with 17% EDTA followed by controlled induction of bleeding beyond the apex to produce a blood clot scaffold for regenerative endodontic treatment.

PROCEDUREPRF + 5% EDTA

Application of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) scaffold after final irrigation with 5% EDTA during regenerative endodontic therapy.

PROCEDUREPRF + 17% EDTA

Use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) scaffold following final irrigation with 17% EDTA in regenerative endodontic treatment.

PROCEDURECGF + 5% EDTA

Placement of concentrated growth factor (CGF) scaffold after final irrigation with 5% EDTA as part of the regenerative endodontic protocol.

PROCEDURECGF + 17% EDTA

Placement of concentrated growth factor (CGF) scaffold following final irrigation with 17% EDTA during regenerative endodontic treatment.

Sponsors

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

No blinding was possible because the type of scaffold (blood clot, PRF, or CGF) and the EDTA concentration (5% or 17%) were visibly identifiable during the clinical procedure. Operators could not be masked, and participants were aware of the treatment steps, making the study open label.

Intervention model description

This study used a parallel-group interventional model in which 30 immature permanent teeth diagnosed with pulp necrosis were randomly assigned to six treatment arms. Each participant received only one intervention, consisting of one scaffold type (blood clot, PRF, or CGF) combined with either 5% or 17% EDTA as the final irrigant. All groups were treated and followed simultaneously, and no crossover occurred between interventions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Immature permanent teeth with open apices * Diagnosis of pulp necrosis * Radiographic evidence of periapical pathology * Teeth suitable for isolation and restoration * Patients aged 9 to 25 years * No systemic diseases that contraindicate dental treatment * Willingness to attend follow-up visits * Signed informed consent by patient or guardian

Exclusion criteria

* Teeth with root fractures * Teeth with severe canal curvature (\>30°) * Teeth with advanced root resorption * Periodontal pocket depth \>3 mm * Previous endodontic treatment or retreatment * Pregnancy * Use of antibiotics or analgesics within the last 7 days * Nonrestorable crowns * Uncooperative patients unable to attend follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Root Length IncreaseBaseline to 12 monthsIncrease in root length measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apical Diameter Change (Apical Closure)Baseline to 12 monthsChange in apical diameter measured by CBCT, used to evaluate apical closure after regenerative treatment.
Periapical Lesion Volume ReductionBaseline to 12 monthsVolumetric reduction in periapical radiolucency measured by CBCT segmentation.
Hard Tissue Formation VolumeBaseline to 12 monthsIncrease in newly formed mineralized tissue volume assessed by CBCT 3D segmentation.
Pulp Sensitivity Response12 monthsPresence or absence of a positive response to cold testing and electric pulp testing (EPT).
Clinical HealingBaseline, 6 months, and 12 monthsAbsence of pain, swelling, sinus tract, and percussion sensitivity during follow-up examinations.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026