Skip to content

Comparison of Emergence Agitation Between Remimazolam With Flumazenil and Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Nasal Surgery

Comparison of Emergence Agitation Between Remimazolam With Flumazenil and Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Nasal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07265050
Enrollment
204
Registered
2025-12-04
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergence Agitation

Brief summary

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive general anesthesia with either remimazolaml-based total intravenous anesthesia reversed with flumazenil or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia. The primary outcome is the incidence of emergence agitation evaluated at the time of awakening after surgery. Additional outcomes include time to extubation, hemodynamic stability, airway complications such as coughing or laryngospasm, and postoperative recovery profiles including pain, nausea, vomiting, and sedation in the post-anesthesia care unit. This study aims to determine whether remimazolam with flumazenil provides smoother emergence compared with propofol in patients undergoing nasal surgery.

Interventions

DRUGRemimazolam with Flumazenil

General anesthesia is induced and maintained with remimazolam (initial infusion approximately 6 mg/kg/hr for induction, then 1-2 mg/kg/hr for maintenance), along with remifentanil for analgesia. At the end of surgery, flumazenil is administered to reverse the sedative effect, starting with 0.2 mg IV, followed by 0.1 mg incremental doses every 1 minute as needed, up to a total dose of 1.0 mg.

DRUGPropofol

General anesthesia is induced and maintained with propofol using target-controlled infusion (effect-site concentration up to 4.0 μg/mL), along with remifentanil for analgesia.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Adults aged 19 years or older scheduled to undergo nasal surgery requiring general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Declines or is unable to provide informed consent * Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² * Pre-existing neurological or cognitive impairment * Known contraindication or allergy to remimazolam, propofol, or flumazenil * Any condition judged by the investigator to make participation inappropriate (e.g., unstable medical status, severe comorbidities)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of Emergence AgitationFrom discontinuation of anesthesia to exit in the operating room

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Tracheal ExtubationFrom anesthesia discontinuation to extubation in the operating room
Intraoperative Hemodynamic StabilityDuring anesthesia
Incidence of Airway Complications During Emergenceduring anesthesiaComplications such as coughing, desaturation, and laryngospasm will be recorded based on direct observation by anesthesiologists.

Contacts

Primary ContactKyung Won Shin
skwskw126@gmail.com02-2072-2469

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026