Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation and Accelerated Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression

Comparison of the Efficacy of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation and Accelerated Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07264452
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-12-04
Start date
2025-11-15
Completion date
2027-01-15
Last updated
2025-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accelerated Protocol, Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation, Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD), Unilateral rTMS

Keywords

Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Accelerated protocol, intermittent theta burst stimulation, Continuous theta burst stimulation, Unilateral rTMS, unipolar major depressive disorder, non-invasive brain stimulation

Brief summary

In recent years, research on the effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with treatment-resistant depression (RTD) has been steadily increasing. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of accelerated unilateral application of two different forms of theta burst stimulation (TBU), a variation of repetitive TMU (rTMS)-intermittent TBU (iTBU) and continuous TBU (cTBU)-in TDD patients. The study aimed to compare the advantages of iTBU and cTBU protocols on depression, suicidal thoughts, anxiety levels, sleep disturbances, cognitive performance, and overall functioning following a two-week intensive treatment period and a 12-week follow-up period.

Detailed description

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the most common form of mood disorders that is frequently encountered in the society, has high recurrence and chronicity rates, and can lead to significant physical, cognitive, and psychosocial dysfunction in individuals. Although there is no single universally accepted definition for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), one of the most frequently used definitions is failure to respond to at least two different antidepressant treatments for a sufficient duration and at an appropriate dose. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the left and/or right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stands out as an alternative treatment approach in patients with TRD. One of these methods, theta-burst stimulation (TBS), is a non-invasive neuromodulation method approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment-resistant depression. Current methodological advances have enabled current TBS protocols to; Therapeutic efficacy can be enhanced by applying sessions multiple times a day, increasing the stimulation dose, and more precisely targeting the bilateral DLPFC. In addition to intermittent TBS (iTBS), continuous TBS (cTBS) protocols applied to the right DLPFC have also been reported to offer therapeutic potential in patients with TDD. Several studies have demonstrated that protocols consisting of 1,800 pulses produce lasting changes in cortical excitability and effectively trigger targeted neuroplastic mechanisms. The study was planned to be conducted with patients who presented to the Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry Outpatient Clinic and were diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) according to the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups. In this single-blind, parallel study, one group was scheduled to receive a total of 50 sessions of iTBS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (left-DLPFC), while the other group received 50 sessions of cTBS to the right-DLPFC. Clinical assessments of patients will be conducted at baseline, mid-treatment, at the end of treatment, and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 post-treatment. Depressive symptoms will be measured with the HAM-D and MADRS, anxiety with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), sleep disturbances with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), cognitive functions with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), and functioning with the Brief Functioning Assessment Scale (BFAS). Participants were expected to maintain their current psychotropic medication at stable doses throughout the study.

Interventions

A total of 50 sessions will be administered to at least 30 patients, five sessions per day, five days a week for two weeks. There will be at least a 30-minute rest period between each session. One session for Group A involves a 5 Hz frequency intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) protocol applied to the left DLPFC at 90-110% motor threshold.

Sponsors

Ataturk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 to 65 years old 2. Patients diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder according to DSM 5 and the severity of their illness 3. Scoring 7 points or more on the Maudsley staging method 4. Having depression unresponsive to 2 different antidepressants 5. No clinical mental retardation 6. Agree to participate in the study 7. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 \[HDRS\] score of 20 or higher 8. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale \[MADRS\] score of 20 or above 9. Being right hand dominant 10. Having used the same antidepressant at the same dose for the last 4 weeks

Exclusion criteria

1. Diagnosed with a neurological or metabolic disease that affects cognitive functions (Systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal failure, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, polyneuropathy, inflammatory rheumatologic disease and malignancies) 2. Having a foreign body such as a pacemaker, intracranial implant that can magnetically interact 3. Hearing and visual impairments that prevent communication 4. Unstable or acute medical conditions 5. Pregnancy or breastfeeding 6. Having a primary psychiatric disorder other than major depressive disorder 7. Being diagnosed with severe MDD with psychotic features

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression severitypretreatment, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeksThe Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-60. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Suicidal ideation score of The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17pretreatment, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeksSuicidal ideation score on the third question of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Suicidal ideation score of The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scalepretreatment, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeksSuicidal ideation score on the tenth question of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Minimum and maximum scores range from 0-6. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Anxiety severitypretreatment, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeksHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-56. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Cognitive Assessmentpretreatment and 14 weeksMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) : The maximum score that can be obtained from the test is 30. A total score of 21 and above indicates that the participant is within normal limits.
Functionality Severitypretreatment, 2 weeks and 14 weeksFunctioning Assessment Short Test (FAST): It is used to measure patients' functionality. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-66. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Insomnia Severitypretreatment, 4 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeksIt is measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The minimum and maximum scores are 0-21. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactMahmut Balamur, research assistant doctor
m.balamur5@gmail.com+905350705623
Backup ContactOmer Faruk UYGUR, Associate professor doctor
drofuygur@hotmail.com+905456161625

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026