Skip to content

A Phase 1b Study of BHV-7000 in Participants With Inherited Erythromelalgia

A Phase 1b, Double-Blind, Crossover Study of BHV-7000 in Patients With Inherited Erythromelalgia (IEM) With NaV1.7 Gain of Function Mutations

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07262268
Enrollment
5
Registered
2025-12-03
Start date
2026-01-15
Completion date
2026-11-01
Last updated
2026-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Familial Erythromelalgia

Keywords

Erythomelalgia, IEM, Primary Erythomelalgia, SCN9A, NaV1.7, Channelopathy, Red Neuralgia, Neuropathic Pain, Inherited Erythomelalgia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the potential benefits of BHV-7000 in reducing chronic pain in participants with IEM with a previously demonstrated gain of function mutation in the SCN9A gene.

Interventions

Participants will take blinded investigational product (IP) orally once daily

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo taken orally once daily

Sponsors

Biohaven Therapeutics Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult men and women between 18 to 75 years of age, inclusive, at time of consent with a diagnosis of inherited erythromelalgia with a previously characterized gain of function NaV1.7 mutation resulting in chronic pain. 2. Absence of concomitant mutation resulting in Kv7.2/7.3 gain of function. 3. Ability and willingness to adhere to the study procedures and complete accurate pain diaries 4. Stable background analgesic regimen for at least 30 days before screening and willingness to maintain the same analgesic regimen during the study period. Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Any clinically significant laboratory abnormalities or clinically significant abnormalities on screening physical examination, vital signs, or ECG that, in the judgment of the principal investigator, indicates a medical problem that would preclude study participation. 2. Any medical condition, based on the judgement of the Investigator, that would confound the ability to adequately assess safety and efficacy outcome measures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean of the daily average maximum pain intensity scores collected every 2 hours.The last 3 weeks of each 4-week crossover treatment periodParticipants will be asked to record peak (worst) pain experienced in the previous 2 hours using an 11-point Likert scale (0-10) where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The average weekly frequency of pain attacks on treatment vs. placeboThe last 3 weeks of each 4-week crossover treatment periodParticipants will be asked to record occurrence of pain attacks
The average duration of pain attacks on treatment vs. placeboThe last 3 weeks of each 4-week crossover treatment periodParticipants will be asked to record the duration of their pain attacks
The average peak severity of pain attacks on treatment vs. placeboThe last 3 weeks of each 4-week crossover treatment periodParticipants will be asked to record the maximum severity of their pain attacks using an 11-point Likert scale (0-10) where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain.
Safety and tolerability by reporting the frequency of unique participants with SAEs, severe AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, deaths, and Grade 3-4 (CTCAE/DAIDS) laboratory abnormalities.Up to 16 weeksMeasured by assessing the number of unique participants who experience treatment-emergent serious adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation, or moderate and severe adverse events.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 9, 2026