Coronary Artery Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
Clinical investigation with CE-marked medical devices, multicenter, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high embolic risk and with at least one high bleeding risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document will be randomized to left atrial appendage closure with either the Amplatzer Amulet™ or the LAmbre™ device. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of both devices regarding successful implantation, effective appendage closure, and clinical outcomes at follow-up.
Detailed description
Clinical investigation with CE-marked medical devices, multicenter, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high embolic risk and with at least one high bleeding risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document will be randomized to left atrial appendage closure with either the Amplatzer Amulet™ or the LAmbre™ device. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of both devices regarding successful implantation, effective appendage closure, and clinical outcomes at follow-up.
Interventions
Left atrial appendage closure with the Amplatzer Amulet™ device. The procedure will be performed according to standard practice using the manufacturer's instructions for use.
Left atrial appendage closure with the LAmbre™ device. The procedure will be performed according to standard practice using the manufacturer's instructions for use.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
(MUST MEET ALL INCLUSION CRITERIA) * Patient with aged ≥18 years AND; * Patient have non-valvular atrial (NVAF) with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, and presented at least one high-bleeding-risk criterion according to the Munich consensus document AND; * Patient are required to undergo preprocedural TEE / CCTA to confirm the absence of LAA thrombus and to ensure that LAA anatomy is suitable for closure with either device. * Patient who has been informed of the characteristics of the study and has provided written informed consent..
Exclusion criteria
(MUST NOT MEET ANY
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| EFFICACY: Device success | 3 months | Percentage Device success defined as: Successful deployment and stable implantation of the assigned device within the left atrial appendage during the index procedure and no crossover to the alternative device and effective closure of the appendage with a residual leak ≤5 mm as assessed by TEE(Transesophageal Echocardiography) or CCTA (Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography) at 90 days. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| EFFICACY: Residual leak | 3 months | Percentage of residual leak \>5 mm as assessed by TEE or CCTA (core lab evaluation). |
| SAFETY: Clinical success | 3 months | Percentage of Device success plus absence of all-cause mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, or procedure-related complications at 90 days. |
| SAFETY: Procedure-related complications | 7 days | Percentage of Composite of death, stroke, systemic or pulmonary embolism, air embolism, any bleeding, pericardial effusion, vascular access complication, device-related complication, or AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) within 7 days (or later if related to the procedure). |
| SAFETY:Device-related thrombus (DRT) | 3 months | Percentage of Homogeneous mass (TEE) or hypoattenuated thickening (CCTA) on the atrial surface of the device, adjudicated by independent imaging experts. |
| SAFETY: MACE | 3 months | Percentage of Composite of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and bleeding (classified by BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium)). |