Suicidal Ideation, Suicide, Suicide Prevention
Conditions
Keywords
Safety Plan, Safety Planning, Suicide prevention, Risicoformulering, risk formulation, detention, prison, incarceration
Brief summary
People in detention are at significantly higher risk of suicide compared to the general population. In Belgian prisons, the suicide rate is five times higher than average. Despite the availability of suicide prevention tools, many are not scientifically validated or adapted to the detention context, leading to inconsistent use and missed warning signs. This study aims to evaluate and adapt three evidence-based suicide prevention tools-the Safety Plan, the guideline for the care and evaluation of suicidality , and the Risk Formulation template-for use in detention settings. Through interviews with both professionals working in prisons and individuals in detention, the study explores how these tools can be made more relevant, practical, and effective in this unique environment. The research involves 40 participants: 20 professionals and 20 individuals in detention. Interviews will gather feedback on the tools' usability, clarity, and fit with the realities of prison life. The ultimate goal is to improve suicide prevention practices in detention by offering tailored, scientifically grounded tools that support both staff and detainees.
Interventions
OTHERCo-creation process for suicide prevention tools in detention
The intervention consists of a co-creation process involving detained individuals and detention professionals through semi-structured interviews. For professionals, the interviews will focus on the usability, applicability, and implementation of three suicide prevention tools. Interviews with individuals in detention will focus only on the Safety Plan. They will be asked about what helps them in moments of crisis and their views on the Safety Plan in detention. The goal is to collect feedback on usability, perceived barriers, and suggestions for real-world implementation in the detention context. Interviews are repeated up to three times per professional participants depending on availability and co-creation progress. For individuals in detention there is only one interview. Feedback from all participants will be used to adapt and refine the tools for future use in detention facilities.
Sponsors
University Ghent
Study design
Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
For professionals working in detention: Inclusion criteria: * Aged 18 years or older * Currently working in a professional care role within a prison setting (e.g., psychologist, psychiatirst, social worker, nurse, etc.) * Experience in supporting or treating incarcerated individuals with suicidal thoughts or behaviours
Exclusion criteria
* Under the age of 18 * Not employed in a professional caregiving role within detention (e.g., correctional officers or security staff) For people in detention: Inclusion criteria: * Aged 18 years or older * Experienced suicidal thoughts within the past three years
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of Suicide Prevention Tools in the Detention Context | Each participant is assessed during one (for incarcerated individuals) or up to three (for professionals) interviews | This outcome measure assesses the usability, applicability, and improvement potential of three suicide prevention tools based on qualitative feedback from professionals working in detention and individuals in detention. Through semi-structured interviews, the study explores how these tools are experienced in practice, identifies perceived strengths and limitations, and gathers concrete suggestions for adaptation to better fit the detention environment. |
Countries
Belgium
Contacts
Primary ContactEva De Jaegere, PhD
Backup ContactKirsten Pauwels, Msc
Outcome results
None listed