Skip to content

Evaluation of Tolerance and Quality of Life in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With Oral Anti-Tumor Drugs Within a Therapeutic Education Program

Evaluation of Tolerance and Quality of Life in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With Oral Anti-Tumor Drugs Within a Therapeutic Education Program

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07258810
Acronym
ETP-NET
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-12-02
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2027-02-01
Last updated
2025-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuroendocrine (NE) Tumors, Oral Anti-Tumor Drugs, Therapeutic Education Program

Keywords

Neuroendocrine tumor, Oral Anti-Tumor Drugs, Therapeutic Education Program, Tolerance, Quality of Life

Brief summary

In recent years, the arrival of targeted oral therapies has greatly changed cancer treatment. These therapies help patients stay independent by reducing the number of hospital visits, since the treatment is given at home. However, this way of giving treatment brings specific challenges, especially in managing side effects and making sure patients follow their treatment properly. Because of this, many patient education programs have been created to help patients learn how to manage their treatment on their own. Although only a few studies have formally looked at how useful these programs are, the available information suggests that they help patients handle side effects better and follow their treatment more closely. Neuroendocrine tumors are a diverse group of tumors that are becoming more common. More patients with these tumors are now treated with targeted oral therapies such as everolimus, sunitinib, cabozantinib, or chemotherapy with temozolomide and capecitabine. These treatments are often given together with a patient education program. However, so far, no study has specifically looked at how helpful these education programs are for this group of patients.

Interventions

OTHERQuestionnaires

questionnaires given to patients in both groups: treatment adherence (MMAS-4 scale) at months 1 and 3, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) at months 0, 1 and 3, and a satisfaction questionnaire developed and validated by the healthcare team and members of the French patient association for individuals with various neuroendocrine tumors (APTED) at month 3.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient (\>18 years) at the time of the study * Patient diagnosed with a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) with an indication for treatment with oral anti-tumor agents (everolimus, sunitinib, cabozantinib, temozolomide +/- capecitabine, others including lenvatinib) * Collection of the patient's non-opposition to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Minors * Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding women * Persons deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision * Adults under legal protection measures (guardianship, conservatorship) * Refusal to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of the incidence of grade 3 to 5 adverse events in patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with oral anti-tumor agents (ATO), based on their participation in a therapeutic education programat 3 months* Adverse effects (CTCAE v5.0) within 3 months following the initiation of ATO Grade 3-4 and 5 adverse effects: hematological, digestive, cutaneous, renal, hepatic toxicity (cytolysis \>5x normal), cardiovascular (including arterial hypertension and thromboembolic complications), pulmonary (interstitial lung disease), metabolic (including hyperglycemia, lipid profile abnormalities) * Actions taken at Month 1 and Month 3 Treatment suspension or delay of the cycle: number of suspensions, duration of suspension (in days) or number of cycle delays, duration of delay (in days) Dose reduction: reduction (yes/no), new dose Hospitalization due to adverse effects: number of hospitalizations, duration (total number of hospitalization days) * Description of patient follow-up and therapeutic patient education program Number of consultations: teleconsultation or in-person consultation, with nurse or physician (general practitioner or oncologist) Number of phone calls: with nurse or physician

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactLaura Dr Gerard
laura.gerard@chu-lyon.fr+33472119167
Backup ContactThomas Dr Walter
thomas.walter@chu-lyon.fr+33472117398

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026