Skip to content

Sensory Deficit Following ACL Reconstruction: PRF Pilot Study

The Effect of Platelet-rich Fibrin on the Regeneration of Patellar Ligament Defects and the Functional Recovery of Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07257666
Acronym
PRF-ACL
Enrollment
53
Registered
2025-12-02
Start date
2022-01-07
Completion date
2025-07-14
Last updated
2025-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Knee Injuries, Sensory Disorders, Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft, Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)

Keywords

Platelet-Rich Fibrin, ACL reconstruction, Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone autograft, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Knee Surgery, Sensory Deficit, Donor Site Morbidity

Brief summary

Pilot, single-center, non-randomized, parallel-group clinical study designed to assess whether intraoperative application of autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) at the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) donor site reduces postoperative anterior knee sensory deficit after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in competitively active male athletes. Planned enrollment is 53 participants allocated to a PRF cohort or a standard-care cohort. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants without anterior knee sensory deficit at 12 months post-surgery.

Detailed description

Background: Sensory deficit around the BPTB donor site is a recognized complication after ACL reconstruction and may affect patient satisfaction and functional recovery. PRF is an autologous bioregenerative product with potential to support soft-tissue healing. Objective: To determine whether PRF application at the donor site reduces anterior knee sensory deficit compared with standard surgical care. Design and Participants: Single-center, prospective, pilot, non-randomized study with two parallel cohorts (PRF vs standard care). Competitively active male athletes meeting prespecified eligibility criteria are followed at 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgery. Recruitment window: January 2022 to January 2023. Interventions: In the PRF cohort, PRF is prepared intraoperatively and applied to the donor site per manufacturer protocol; the comparator cohort receives standard closure without PRF. Assessments: Primary outcome: Proportion of participants without anterior knee sensory deficit at 12 months. Sensory testing is performed over a predefined 9-point area lateral to the surgical scar (eyes closed; contralateral knee used as reference if uncertain). Secondary outcomes: Patient-reported knee function instruments (International Knee Documentation Committee \[IKDC\] Subjective Knee Form and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale), each reported as total score (0-100; higher scores indicate better function) at 4, 8, and 12 months; optional MRI-based assessments of the donor site per protocol; safety monitoring of adverse events. Analysis (planned): Group comparisons using appropriate categorical and non-parametric methods with prespecified approaches to handle multiplicity.

Interventions

Autologous PRF prepared intraoperatively from patient's venous blood and applied at the donor site after graft harvesting.

PROCEDUREStandard Closure (Control)

Conventional closure of the donor site without PRF application

Sponsors

University of Belgrade
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-40 years * Isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture confirmed by MRI and clinical examination * Planned ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft * Written informed consent provided

Exclusion criteria

* Previous knee surgery on the affected knee * Associated ligament injuries requiring additional reconstruction * Significant cartilage damage (Outerbridge grade III-IV beyond donor site changes) * Systemic disease affecting wound healing (e.g., diabetes mellitus, autoimmune disease) * Active infection * Refusal or inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants without anterior knee sensory deficit at the donor site12 months post-surgerySensory function assessed over a predefined 9-point area lateral to the surgical scar; deficit coded as 1 if \>3 points are reported as no or altered touch, otherwise 0. Assessment performed with eyes closed; contralateral knee used for reference if uncertain. Measure Type & Units: Percentage of participants (%)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form score (0-100; higher scores indicate better function)Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgeryPatient-reported outcome; total score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (0-100; higher scores indicate better function)Baseline, 4, 8, 12 months after surgeryPatient-reported outcome; total score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

Countries

Serbia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026