Pain Perception
Conditions
Keywords
Dental Anesthesia
Brief summary
A Spilt Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation Of The Electronic Anesthetic Efficacy Comparison of traditional local anesthesia with electronic local anesthesia in terms of the ability to reduce pain during injection and the duration of the anesthetic effect
Detailed description
Study Design: The mouth will be split in half using a split mouth study. The lower anterior teeth will be injected with a conventional local anesthetic syringe on one side, and the patient will be injected with an electronic anesthetic syringe on the other side. The study will be conducted on a sample of volunteers aged 18 to 30 years at the Faculty of Dentistry at Al-Andalus University. The objectives and procedure will be explained to each group of patients, and informed consent will be obtained from each patient to accept the research procedures. A 2% non-vasoconstrictor lidocaine local anesthetic will be used for all patients.
Interventions
DRUGExperimental group: Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm
Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side, while Smartject was used on the experimental side
DRUGcontrol group: therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe
During the appointment, the subjects randomly received 1.8 ml of 2% plain lidocaine for the Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side
Sponsors
Mouetaz Kheirallah
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Investigator)
Masking description
single blinded
Intervention model description
The split-mouth design was applied to the study group, with one arm for therapeutic intervention involving Smartject injection , and the other arm involving traditional injectors
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
. Age ranged from 20 to 30 years , no menstrual cycle, The participants were not allergic to local anesthetics, had not used medication that would alter pain perception, none of them had not ever experienced Smartject injection before, and none of them were alcoholics or smokers, The participants were not allergic to local anesthetics.
Exclusion criteria
allergic to local anesthetics ,females during menstural cycle ,bad oral care.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Onset time | 2 month | was considered as the period between the end of the injection and the first subsequent Onset time was considered as the period between the end of the injection and the first subsequent readings without response. After this period, the tooth was tested every 10 minutes until readings returned to the baseline threshold. Each subject was asked to record the time of return to normal sensation in the lower lip |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | 2 month | VAS uses a straight horizontal line of extent measuring 10 cm. The ends state the maximum limit of pain orientated from the best (right) to the worst (left) so that the patient can indicate the intensity of the pain (0-100). The intensity of pain is made by measuring the dimension from no pain to very severe pain based on the patient's signs |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| duration of the anesthesia | 2 month | was asked to record the time of return to normal sensation in the lower lip |
Countries
Syria
Outcome results
None listed