Skip to content

HFTO Via Tracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Patients

High-Flow Oxygen Therapy Via Tracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Patients

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07257016
Enrollment
28
Registered
2025-12-02
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2025-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High Flow Oxygen Therapy, Neuro ICU

Brief summary

Neurocritical patients often require prolonged invasive ventilation due to impaired respiratory drive and airway protection deficits. While early weaning reduces complications and costs, these patients frequently pass spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) yet remain intubated solely for airway protection. Current practice maintains low-level pressure support ventilation (5-8 cmH₂O) to offset endotracheal tube resistance. However, prolonged ventilation increases risks of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and diaphragm dysfunction. Emerging evidence suggests appropriately sized tubes may not substantially increase work of breathing (WOB). High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) delivers heated, humidified oxygen at high flow rates, reducing WOB and improving oxygenation and comfort. While validated for tracheostomized patients, HFOT via tracheal intubation (HFOT-TI) remains unstudied in neurocritical populations during early weaning. This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of HFOT-TI in neurocritical patients who have passed SBT but require ongoing airway protection.

Detailed description

Neurocritical patients, including those with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or intracranial hemorrhage, often require prolonged mechanical ventilation due to impaired respiratory drive or airway protection needs. Weaning these patients from invasive ventilation involves two key stages: liberation from mechanical support and extubation. Early weaning reduces complications, accelerates recovery, and lowers healthcare costs. Clinical guidelines advocate early weaning assessments for patients ventilated for over 24 hours, followed by spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) to confirm readiness for independent breathing. While patients passing SBT are typically extubated promptly, neurocritical patients often face delayed extubation due to impaired consciousness or inadequate airway protection, despite adequate respiratory function. In these cases, the tracheal tube primarily ensures airway protection rather than ventilatory support. Traditionally, low-level ventilatory support (e.g., pressure support of 5-8 cmH₂O) is used to counter the inspiratory resistance of the tracheal tube and provide humidified gas. However, prolonged ventilation, even at minimal levels, may increase risks such as ventilator-associated pneumonia and diaphragm dysfunction. Evidence indicates that appropriately sized tracheal tubes may not substantially increase the work of breathing (WOB), and some patients can compensate for this resistance without ventilatory support. High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT), delivered via nasal cannula or tracheostomy, provides heated, humidified oxygen at high flow rates, enhancing oxygenation, reducing WOB, and improving patient comfort. Emerging evidence supports its role in facilitating weaning in tracheostomized patients and during SBT in intubated patients. However, the safety and feasibility of HFOT via tracheal intubation (HFOT-TI) in neurocritical patients during early weaning remain largely unexplored. Given the prolonged airway protection needs in this population, HFOT-TI may serve as an effective bridge to extubation, potentially minimizing prolonged ventilatory support and associated complications. Investigators aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of HFOT-TI in neurocritical patients who have passed SBT but require ongoing airway protection. Investigators assessed changes in respiratory parameters and safety outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEHFTO

Use a high-flow oxygen therapy system connected to the endotracheal tube via a dedicated adapter. Initial settings: Flow rate 40 L/min, FiO₂ titrated to maintain patient SpO₂ ≥ 95%.

DEVICEPSV

Continue low-level pressure support ventilation using a mechanical ventilator. Parameter settings: Pressure support (PS) 5-8 cmH₂O, PEEP 5 cmH₂O, FiO₂ ≤ 0.40.

Sponsors

Capital Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years. * Post-neurosurgical or brain injury patients with stable intracranial status (Glasgow Coma Scale ≥ 9, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score -2 to +1). * Successful completion of a 30-minute T-piece spontaneous breathing trial (per standard SBT failure criteria). * Poor airway protection capacity (STAGE score \< 6) necessitates ongoing intubation for respiratory support, as determined by the attending physician. * Signed informed consent (by patient or legal representative).

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to esophageal pressure monitoring (e.g., esophageal varices, recent esophageal surgery). * History of chronic respiratory diseases (e.g., COPD, severe asthma). * Chronic heart failure (NYHA class III-IV) or severe arrhythmia. * Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 30 kg/m². * Pregnancy. * Anticipated need for tracheostomy without extubation attempt * Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PTPes48 hoursPTPes is defined as the area enclosed by the Pcw and Pes curves during the inspiratory phase, multiplied by the respiratory rate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pmus48 hoursPmus is defined as the maximum difference between the chest wall recoil pressure (Pcw) and the esophageal pressure (Pes) during inspiration.
ΔPes48 hoursThe change in Pes (ΔPes) is the difference between the Pes at the start of inspiration and the maximum negative deflection of Pes during inspiration.
Ventilator-Free Days28 daysVentilator-Free Days during the first 28 days

Contacts

Primary ContactChen Guangqiang
acapoftea2021@163.com8615910783162

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026