Skip to content

Comparison Between C-mac,Pentax Video Laryngoscopes and Machintosh Laryngoscope

Comparative Evaluation of C-Mac, Pentax Video Laryngoscopes, and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Endotracheal Intubation in Intensive Care Unit Wearing a Face Shield.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07255235
Enrollment
84
Registered
2025-11-28
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2026-02-28
Last updated
2025-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Brief summary

Asses and compare the practility and the level of difficulty in using C-mac and pentax video-laryngoscopes or the traditional Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation in ICU patients while wearing face shield

Detailed description

The endotracheal intubation will be performed with anesthesiologist working in ICU previously trained and experienced in videolaryngoscopy and will be classified according to their skill into 3 groups: Junior (1 year up to 3 year) senior, (3 year up to 8 years) and consultant (more than 8 years) experience. All the laryngoscopist groups will equally attend in performing intubation of the studied group. After the patient consent, the allocation will be opened and preparation for intubation will start. All the intubations will be performed with the presence of two laryngoscopist: one of them at least senior or consultant. After confirmation of well working standard monitoring (ECG, blood pressure, Spo2 and End-tidal CO2) and preoxygenation with 100% oxygen, induction with propofol (1-2 mg/kg) and rocuronium (0.9 mg/kg) will be achieved by an assistant. While wearing head-fitted face shield, the anesthetist will perform intubation with suitable sized laryngoscopy blade and endotracheal tube. Successful placement of ETT will be confirmed by both auscaltation and capnography (normal appearing waveform over four or more breathing cycles). During endotracheal intubation, anesthesiologists will be permitted to make ergonomic adjustments, such as altering the bed height, position of the patient head and utilize external laryngeal manipulations, equipment adjustment and use of stylet based on their personal preferences. After three failed attempts of intubation, alternative techniques will be used and subsequently, they will not be included in the analysis. Alternative techniques such as gum elastic bougie, laryngeal mask airway (LMA), Cricothyrotomy set will be ready to any unexpected difficult airway. An intubation attempt is defined as introduction of laryngoscope and its subsequent removal with or without endotracheal tube (ETT) placement. Correct placement of ETT in first attempt by an individual laryngoscopist will be defined as first-pass successful intubation.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Minia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All patients between age 18 - 65 year who will need elective orotracheal intubation will be included in the study after collection of data relevant to intubation

Exclusion criteria

* • Patients with BMI \> 35. * Pregnant and lactating patients. * Burn and facial trauma patients. * Suspected or confirmed spine injury. * Presence of any predictors or history of difficult intubation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success rate of first pass of orotracheal intubationUntill the end of the study in average of 1 yearPassage of the orotracheal tube from the first time confirmed By capnography

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMai M Mohamed Ali Mosa
mahmoudmai481@gmail.com+201000543376

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026