Skip to content

Interest of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Upper Urinary Tract Invasive Tumours

Interest of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Upper Urinary Tract Invasive Tumours

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07252882
Acronym
UUTICaD
Enrollment
178
Registered
2025-11-28
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Urologic Cancer

Keywords

Upper urinary tract magnetic resonance imaging

Brief summary

Upper urinary tract invasive cancer magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis

Detailed description

Urothelial tumours are the 6th most common cause of cancer in developed countries and occur throughout the urinary tract (urethra, bladder, ureter and pelvic cavities). Upper urinary tract tumours account for 5-10% of urothelial carcinomas. Nearly 60% of patients with upper urinary tract tumours are diagnosed as invasive (≥ T2). 90% of computed tomography lesions are tumour lesions. Currently, the diagnosis of upper urinary tract tumours is based on computed tomography with injection of nephrotoxic iodinated contrast medium (uro-computed tomography) and biopsies taken during ureteroscopy under general anaesthesia. Invasive tumours have a poor prognosis and patients with infiltrating tumours may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to nephroureterectomy (which may impair renal function). Uro-computed tomography cannot differentiate between invasive and non-invasive tumours and biopsies taken in the operating theatre during ureteroscopy under general anaesthesia are unreliable for staging and frequently underestimate the disease. The diagnosis of infiltrating tumours is most often made on nephro-ureterectomy specimens, making neoadjuvant treatment impossible. Recently, functional magnetic resonance imaging sequences (diffusion weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient) highlighted the biophysical properties of the tissues such as cellular organisation, density and microcirculation and have thus made it possible to differentiate benign from malignant lesions by identifying the level of tissue involvement. Magnetic resonance imaging has become a real tool in the diagnosis of bladder tumours and can differentiate between infiltrating and non-infiltrating lesions. The aim of this study is to make magnetic resonance imaging for each patient and compare results to pathological analysis (nephro-ureterectomy pathologic analysis or biopsy with 3 months Uro-computed tomography) to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis capability for invasive tumour.

Interventions

RADIATIONUpper urinary tract magnetic resonance imaging

Patients with a suspected malignant tumour of the upper urinary excretory tract based on the presence of a suspicious lesion on a uro-computed tomography scan will have a diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging of the urinary tract with Gadolinium-based contrast agents

Sponsors

University Hospital, Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient over 18 years of age with a suspected upper urinary tract tumour based on the presence of a suspicious lesion on a uro-computed tomography scan * Have given free, informed and signed consent * Be affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

* Renal failure not allowing the injection of iodinated contrast media (Glomerular filtration rate \<30mL/min) * Subject under legal protection (guardianship or curatorship) * Pregnant or breastfeeding woman * Person participating in another research study or having participated in a protocol with an exclusion period still in progress at inclusion * Contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (patient with non-magnetic resonance imaging compatible equipment, claustrophobia preventing magnetic resonance imaging) * Acide gadoteric hypersensibility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic validity (composite criteria sensitivity and specifcity) of a predefined magnetic resonance imaging sequence in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract invasive tumour3 monthsDiagnostic validity (sensitivity and specifcity) of a predefined magnetic resonance imaging sequence in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract invasive tumour (taking as reference the pathological analysis \[gold standard\] or biopsy with 3 months Uro-CT).

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactThomas PRUDHOMME, MD
prudhomme.t@chu-toulouse.fr0561322748

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026