Skip to content

Nutritional Management of the Patient With Type 2 Diabetes at Nutritional Risk or With Malnutrition in Clinical Practice

Nutritional Management of the Patient With Type 2 Diabetes at Nutritional Risk or With Malnutrition in Clinical Practice. STARLIGHT Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07252765
Acronym
STARLIGHT
Enrollment
334
Registered
2025-11-28
Start date
2025-11-20
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2026-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Drug-Induced Diabetes, Malnourishment, Malnutrition, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Keywords

Metabolic control, Disease - realted malnutrition, Diabetes-specific formula, T2D, Oral nutritional supplementation, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Malnourishment, Malnutrition, Drug-induced diabetes

Brief summary

The objective of this observational study is to characterize the patient profile and nutritional treatment patterns of individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) or drug-induced diabetes who present with malnutrition, or are at risk of it, and who are prescribed a diabetes-specific oral nutritional supplement (ONS) that is high in calories and protein and contains soluble fiber. Participants will complete a series of questionnaires during visits 1 and 3.

Detailed description

1. Background and Rationale This study focuses on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) who also present with malnutrition or are at risk of developing malnutrition. These conditions negatively affect clinical and functional outcomes, increasing the likelihood of complications and hospitalizations. The use of diabetes-specific oral nutritional supplements (ONS)-characterized by a high caloric and protein content and enriched with soluble fiber-may contribute to improving clinical status, nutritional parameters, and quality of life. Nevertheless, current evidence from real-world clinical practice remains limited and heterogeneous. 2. Primary Objective To characterize the clinical and nutritional profile, as well as the nutritional treatment patterns, of patients with T2D and malnutrition or at risk of malnutrition who are prescribed a diabetes-specific ONS. 3. Secondary Objectives To assess changes in glycemic and metabolic control. To evaluate the nutritional and functional impact of the ONS. To analyze healthcare resource utilization and associated costs. To estimate patient adherence, compliance, and satisfaction with the prescribed ONS. To assess quality-of-life outcomes over a 6-month follow-up period. 4. Exploratory Objective To explore changes in muscle mass using nutritional ultrasound. 5. Study Design Multicenter, prospective, real-world evidence (RWE) study. Conducted across 12 hospitals in Spain. Three scheduled visits: baseline (V1), 3-month follow-up (V2), and 6-month final visit (V3). 6. Study Population A total of 334 adult patients with T2D and either nutritional risk or malnutrition, all of whom are prescribed a diabetes-specific ONS. 7. Collected Variables Sociodemographic: age, sex, education level, etc. Clinical and anthropometric: weight, muscle mass, comorbidities. ONS-related: product name, dosage, duration, modifications, palatability. Nutritional requirements: daily caloric, protein, fat, and carbohydrate needs. Healthcare resource utilization: hospital admissions, emergency visits, specialist consultations, and diabetes medication adjustments. Metabolic profile: HbA1c, fasting glucose, lipid panel, albumin, total protein, hemoglobin, liver enzymes, eGFR, and CRP. Functional assessment: SARC-F scale, handgrip strength, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), nutritional ultrasound, and Timed Up and Go test. Patient-reported outcomes: NutriQoL® quality-of-life questionnaire, satisfaction survey, treatment adherence questionnaire, and ONS palatability scale. 8. Data Management and Analysis Data will be managed by Outcomes'10 and analyzed using STATA v.14. Descriptive and comparative analyses will be conducted to address the primary and secondary objectives. All data will be reviewed and pseudonymized to ensure patient confidentiality.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Outcomes'10
Lead SponsorNETWORK
Nestlé Health Science Spain
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D) or drug-induced diabetes * Patients at nutritional risk according to MUST or presenting malnutrition according to GLIM criteria. * Patients requiring a diabetes-specific oral nutritional supplement (ONS) that is high-calorie, high-protein, and contains soluble fiber in real-world clinical practice, and who have been prescribed such a supplement within the previous 7 days. * Patients able to provide informed consent and complete the study questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients participating in other studies or clinical trials related to malnutrition, or who, in the investigator's opinion, may alter the course of the study. * Patients currently receiving or expected to receive other types of nutritional interventions involving supplements (oral or otherwise) or non-conventional feeding methods (e.g., feeding tubes). * Patients with a history of metabolic/endocrine diseases (other than diabetes) or any other condition causing liver or kidney failure, defined as ALT \> 3x ULN or eGFR \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m², and according to the investigator's judgment. * Patients expected to undergo any surgical intervention or require hospitalization due to a condition unrelated to the study during the study period. * Patients with other conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with adherence to the intervention or with study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Descriptive of study populationBaseline visit (V1)Descriptive information of the population at V1

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage change of blood test parametersFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksChanges in blood test measures will be compared
Associated cost at 6-month follow-upFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksThey will be estimated by multiplying the number of units used by their unit cost (derived from eSalud and Botplus databases). Unit: Number of events; euros (€)
Adherence with prescribed oral nutritional supplement (ONS)From enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksParticipants will be categorized as compliant (≥80% consumption) or non-compliant (\<80%).
Change in functional status of participants over timeFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksChanges between visits in SARC-F scale categories
Change in NutriQoL® quality-of-life scoreFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksPatients will be classified according to a quality-of-life category (excellent, good, acceptable, poor, very poor). Test total scoring values.
Patient satisfaction of the ONS product at 6 monthsFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksResponses to the satisfaction questionnaires will be summarized as number and percentage of participants selecting each category at V3.
Patient palatability of the ONS product at 6 monthsFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksResponses to the palatability questionnaires will be summarized as number and percentage of participants selecting each category at V3.
Health resource useFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksFrequencies of treatment changes, administration route, specialist consultations, and hospitalizations will be recorded and quantitative variables (treatment dose, treatment duration, number and days of hospitalization, consultations) will be summarized using mean ± SD.
Change in nutritional statusFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksIt will be estimated according to GLIM or MUST classification
Percentage change in BMIFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksWeight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m2
Maximum prehensile strenght valueFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksProbe: handgrip test by using a hand dynamometer
30" chair testFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksTest: a patient will have to stand-up and sit-down as maximim number of times in 30", from a chair, with both arms crossed in the chest.
Percentage of patients with improvement in the nutritional statusFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksChanges in GLIM or MUST classifications
Impedancimetry valuesFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 24 weeksTest: bioimpedance

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTMercedes Blanco Naveira, Medical Adviser. MD
mercedes.blanco@es.nestle.com+34 628 237 634

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026