Skip to content

Comparison b/w Carbamazepine vs Oxcarbazepine in Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia

Comparison of Carbamazepine and Oxcarbazepine In the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07252453
Enrollment
122
Registered
2025-11-26
Start date
2025-05-20
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2025-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trigeminal Neuralgia

Keywords

TGN, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine

Brief summary

In this Study investigator is comparing the effectiveness and outcomes of two drugs used un the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia , Carbamazepine vs Oxcarbazepine

Detailed description

In this open pilot open label randomized controlled trial, Investigator is comparing the effectiveness and outcomes of two drugs used un the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, Carbamazepine vs Oxcarbazepine , hypothesis would be that oxcarbazepine has equal or better outcomes comparatively with less side effects

Interventions

DRUGCarbamazepine

Carbamazepine is a conventional drug used to treat trigeminal neuralgia. It primarily works by blocking voltage-gated sodium channels in nerve cells, which prevents rapid and repetitive firing of action potentials and reduces abnormal electrical activity in the brain.

DRUGoxcarbazepine

Oxcarbazepine is comparatively new approved drug in the treatment of TGN. Oxcarbazepine is a prodrug that is rapidly converted to its active metabolite, (monohydroxy metabolite or MHD). This active form works by blocking voltage-sensitive sodium channels in the brain, which stabilizes over-excited nerve membranes and prevents the rapid spread of abnormal electrical activity

Sponsors

Abbasi Shaheed Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18-60 years * Either gender * TGN diagnosis for ≥2 weeks (according to ICHD-3 criteria¹)

Exclusion criteria

\[Expanded\]: * Other cranial neuralgias * Prior surgical treatment for TN * Hepatic/renal dysfunction * Epilepsy * Pregnant/lactating women * Drug allergy or intolerance * \[Expanded\] Uncontrolled hypertension * \[Expanded\] Psychiatric disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain relief for TGNTwo monthsPain relief for Trigeminal neuralgia will be assessed define as complete resolution of symptoms (PAIN) , after prescribing both drugs to each individual group, Pain relief will be assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS SCORE) , which is designated by number 1 to 10, in which 1 means NO PAIN, and 10 means SEVERE PAIN. Annexure will be provided to each participant which includes study consent, demographic details, medical history in relevance with inclusion and exclusion criteria, side effects , LFTs values and printed Visual Analogue Scale on the very same document.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Side effectsTwo monthsSide effects of each drug will be compared including hepatotoxicity through liver functional tests, and other effects including nausea tolerability, dizziness etc. Annexure will be provided to each group participants ( same as mentioned in primary outcome section) ,which includes side effects column specifically Liver Functional Test results including both baselines values ( during the start of treatment ) and final results( at the end of treatment) and comparison will be made between the two drugs regarding side effects specifically hepatotoxicity.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026