Skip to content

Hemodynamic Effects of Remimazolam vs Propofol During Robot-assisted Gynecologic Surgery

A Randomized, Parallel, Open-label With Blinded Assessment Study Comparing Hemodynamic Profiles Between Remimazolam- and Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Gynecologic Surgery

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07251101
Acronym
By_HD
Enrollment
58
Registered
2025-11-26
Start date
2026-05-02
Completion date
2027-12-30
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Intravenous, Gynecologic Surgery, Hemodynamic Stability

Keywords

remimazolam, propofol, hemodynamics, laparoscopic surgery, general anesthesia, Trendelenburg position, pneumoperitoneum, gynecologic surgery, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA)

Brief summary

This single-center study at CHA Ilsan Medical Center compares intraoperative hemodynamics between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecologic surgery requiring pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning.

Detailed description

This study aims to compare intraoperative hemodynamic characteristics between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecologic surgery. Continuous invasive blood pressure will be analyzed to evaluate time-weighted average (TWA) and area-under-the-curve (AUC) differences between groups. The study is designed as a randomized, parallel, open-label with blinded assessment trial.

Interventions

DRUGRemimazolam

Induction with remimazolam 6 mg·kg-¹·h-¹ with remifentanil Ce 4 ng·mL-¹ (Minto model); maintenance remimazolam 1-2 mg·kg-¹·h-¹, titrated (±0.2) to maintain PSI 25-50 and hemodynamic targets. Standard care otherwise per protocol.

DRUGPropofol

Induction with propofol Ce 4 ng·mL-¹ with remifentanil Ce 4 ng·mL-¹; maintenance propofol Ce 2.5-3.5 ng·mL-¹, titrated (±0.2) to maintain PSI 25-50 and hemodynamic targets. Standard care otherwise per protocol.

Sponsors

Ilsan Cha hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
No minimum to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients \<65 years of age * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II * Scheduled to undergo robotic hysterectomy under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m² * Baseline hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg) or bradycardia (heart rate \<60 bpm) * History of ischemic heart disease or cardiac conduction block * Significant cardiopulmonary disease, including hypoxemia (SpO₂ \<90%), uncontrolled asthma, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) * Use of inhalational anesthetics during anesthesia * Conversion from robotic/laparoscopic surgery to open laparotomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MAP (Time-Weighted Average)from induction start (first anesthetic administration) to operating room exit (transfer from OR), approximately up to 5 hours per participant.Continuous invasive arterial pressure is recorded throughout anesthesia. For each participant, TWA-MAP is computed as the integral of MAP over elapsed time divided by total observation time (trapezoidal rule). Data are aggregated at \~1-min resolution when possible. Implausible artifacts (e.g., MAP \<30 or \>180 mmHg) are excluded. The primary comparison is the between-group difference in TWA-MAP (remimazolam vs propofol) for validating hypothesis (remimazolam-based TIVA maintains ≥20% higher intraoperative MAP than propofol-based TIVA). Primary analysis will use ANCOVA adjusting for baseline MAP and prespecified covariates, with a one-sided significance level of 0.05.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Hypertensive Burdenfrom anesthesia induction to operating room exit, assessed continuously during surgery (approximately 2 to 5 hours per participant).Continuous invasive arterial pressure is recorded throughout anesthesia. For each participant, the AUC above the hypertensive threshold (SBP ≥140 mmHg or MAP ≥100 mmHg) is calculated as mmHg·minutes using the trapezoidal rule. This measure represents the cumulative burden of intraoperative hypertension. Group comparisons will assess whether remimazolam-based TIVA differs from propofol-based TIVA in hypertensive burden.
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Hypotensive Burdenfrom anesthesia induction to operating room exit, assessed continuously during surgery (approximately 2 to 5 hours per participant).Continuous invasive arterial pressure is recorded throughout anesthesia. For each participant, the AUC below the hypotensive threshold (SBP \<90 mmHg or MAP \<65 mmHg) is calculated as mmHg·minutes using the trapezoidal rule. This measure represents the cumulative burden of intraoperative hypotension. Group comparisons will assess whether remimazolam-based TIVA differs from propofol-based TIVA in hypotensive burden.

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

CONTACTJoohyun Lee Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, MD
hightothesky1004@gmail.com+82-31-782-8415

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026