Skip to content

Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Right Ventricular Pacing on AHRE Burden in Patients With Preserved LVEF

Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Conventional Right Ventricular Pacing on AHRE Burden in Patients With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and High Ventricular Pacing Dependency (LBBP-AHRE Trial): A Randomized Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07250529
Acronym
LBBP-AHRE
Enrollment
244
Registered
2025-11-26
Start date
2026-02-05
Completion date
2029-06-20
Last updated
2026-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Atrioventricular Block, Pacemaker Therapy, Preserved Ejection Fraction

Keywords

Left bundle branch pacing, Cardiac electrophysiology, Right ventricular pacing, AHRE burden, Preserved ejection fraction, Heart Failure, Quality of life, Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM)

Brief summary

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) compared with conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing on the cumulative duration (total time) of atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who are expected to require frequent ventricular pacing. Atrial High-Rate Episodes (AHREs) are defined as episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmia that are automatically recorded by device diagnostics and detected by implanted cardiac devices. These episodes usually have an atrial rate ≥170 beats per minute and a duration ≥6 minutes. AHREs are linked to a higher risk of thromboembolic events and clinical atrial fibrillation (AF), and they may indicate subclinical AF or other atrial tachyarrhythmias. Chronic RV pacing has been linked to mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony, which may encourage atrial remodeling and the development of AF. LBBP provides a more physiological ventricular activation and may reduce atrial tachyarrhythmia time (AHRE time). Patients with LVEF \>50% and atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders requiring a dual-chamber pacemaker will be randomized to either conventional RV septal pacing or LBBP.

Detailed description

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) compared with conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing on the cumulative duration (total time) of atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who are expected to require frequent ventricular pacing. Atrial High-Rate Episodes (AHREs) are defined as episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmia that are automatically recorded by device diagnostics and detected by implanted cardiac devices. These episodes usually have an atrial rate ≥170 beats per minute and a duration ≥6 minutes. AHREs are linked to a higher risk of thromboembolic events and clinical atrial fibrillation (AF), and they may indicate subclinical AF or other atrial tachyarrhythmias. Device Algorithm Specificity: AHREs will be validated by reviewing the stored atrial electrograms (EGMs) for a random sample of at least 20% of detected episodes to confirm atrial origin, exclude oversensing, and differentiate atrial tachycardia from atrial fibrillation-like episodes. Device model-specific detection thresholds, including refractory oversensing behavior, atrial blanking periods, and sensitivity parameters, will be documented and standardized across participants where possible. Chronic RV pacing has been linked to mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony, which may encourage atrial remodeling and the development of AF. LBBP provides a more physiological ventricular activation and may reduce atrial tachyarrhythmia time (AHRE time). LBBP produces a narrower paced QRS, shorter left ventricular activation time, and more synchronous ventricular contraction compared with RV pacing. These electrophysiologic differences may reduce atrial stretch, left atrial pressure, and atrial substrate remodeling, which are mechanisms believed to lower AHRE burden. Patients with LVEF \>50% and atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders requiring a dual-chamber pacemaker will be randomized to either conventional RV septal pacing or LBBP.

Interventions

DEVICERight Ventricular Pacing

Implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker with the ventricular lead placed in the RV septum. At follow-up, the ventricular pacing percentage and pacing configuration will be noted. All devices used in this study are commercially available in the European Union and carry a valid CE mark.

Implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker with the ventricular lead placed at the left bundle branch area. Physiological pacing will be programmed into the devices and, at follow-up, the percentage of spontaneous pacing will be noted. All devices used in this study are commercially available in the European Union and carry a valid CE mark.

Sponsors

University Hospital of Patras
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The primary hypothesis of the study is that left bundle branch pacing is superior to right ventricular pacing with respect to atrial high-rate episode (AHRE) burden, defined as the cumulative duration of all device-detected AHREs with individual episode duration \>6 minutes from implantation to 24 months (atrial rate threshold ≥170 bpm). Because cumulative AHRE time is expected to be highly right-skewed with a substantial proportion of zero values, the primary endpoint will be analyzed using a prespecified two-part hurdle modeling approach, with the transformed continuous component defined as Y = ln(1 + cumulative AHRE minutes). For sample size determination, a pragmatic design-stage approximation was used based on a two-sample comparison of means on the transformed scale Y. This approach was selected because internal pilot data were available for Y and because closed-form sample size procedures for two-part hurdle models require specification of distributional parameters for both the z

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Scheduled implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker for: Permanent complete heart block Permanent second-degree AV block (Mobitz II or Mobitz I) * Documented preserved LVEF (≥50%) * Sinus rhythm at baseline * Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation * Previous atrial fibrillation ablation (catheter-based or surgical) * LVEF \< 50% * Sinus node disease * Transient AV block requiring pacemaker implantation * Significant structural or valvular heart disease * Requirement for pacemaker system upgrade during the study period * Requirement for antiarrhythmic therapy for causes other than atrial fibrillation * Existing pacemaker or other cardiac device requiring modification for study participation * Enrollment in another clinical trial that could interfere with study endpoints or pacing parameters * Contraindication to LBBP or associated lead implantation procedure * Life expectancy \< 12 months * Any condition judged by the investigator to compromise participation or the integrity of study data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total cumulative AHRE time for device-detected episodes lasting >6 minutesFrom pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months (primary endpoint)Sum of the durations of all device-detected AHREs with individual episode duration \>6 minutes (atrial rate threshold per device diagnostics, typically ≥170 bpm), expressed as total time (minutes/hours). Total analyzable monitoring time will be defined as the interval from implantation to the last successful device interrogation/remote transmission, excluding periods of missing device data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total cumulative time in AHRE episodes with individual episode duration 0 to 6 minutes.From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months (primary endpoint)
Total cumulative time in AHRE episodes with individual episode duration 6 minutes to 6 hours.From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Total cumulative time in AHRE episodes with individual episode duration 6 hours to 24 hours.From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Total cumulative time in AHRE episodes with individual episode duration >24 hours.From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Time to event - for AHRE episodes > 6 minFrom pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Incidence of progression to clinically documented atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal or persistent, symptomatic or asymptomatic, confirmed by ECG, Holter, or wearable monitoring).From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Time to first clinically documented atrial fibrillation.From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Development of permanent atrial fibrillation.From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 monthsAtrial fibrillation (AF) will be evaluated using routine interrogation of implanted pacemakers, which provide device-recorded atrial arrhythmia data, including AF burden and episode duration. Permanent atrial fibrillation will be defined according to the ESC Guidelines for Atrial Fibrillation and will require a consensus decision between the treating physician and the patient that the arrhythmia is ongoing. This consensus will also include an agreement to pursue a rate-control strategy with no further attempts to restore or maintain sinus rhythm.
Time to progression to permanent atrial fibrillation.From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Device- or procedure-related complications (e.g., cardiac perforation, pericardial tamponade, pneumothorax, hemothorax, infection requiring antibiotics or system removal, generator or lead malfunction, hematoma).From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
All-cause mortality.From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Hospitalization due to AFFrom pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Hospitalization due to HFFrom pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Need for cardioversion.From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months
Development of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM)From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 monthsDefined as a drop in LVEF of at least 10 percentage points resulting in LVEF \<50%, or a relative reduction in global longitudinal strain of at least 15%
Changes in biomarkers associated with myocardial stress, inflammation, or injuryAt baseline and at 12 and 24 months, where available.NT-proBNP, hsCRP, and troponin
Changes in structured echocardiographic parametersAt baseline and at 12 and 24 months, where available.Including left atrial strain, left atrial volume index, interventricular mechanical delay, left ventricular mechanical delay, and global longitudinal strain, in participants with available echocardiographic studies from centers able to perform these measurements.
Quality-of-life change assessed using a validated questionnaire during follow-up.At baseline and at 3,6,12,18 and 24 monthsMinnesota living with heart-failure questionnaire

Countries

Greece

Contacts

CONTACTGEORGIOS LEVENTOPOULOS
levent2669@gmail.com+306977786020
CONTACTPeriklis Davlouros
pdav@upatras.gr+306986726300

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026