Skip to content

Adductor Canal Localization in Living and Cadaver

Determination of Adductor Canal Location by USG Measurements and Cadaver Correlation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07247591
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-11-25
Start date
2025-11-25
Completion date
2026-02-01
Last updated
2025-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adductor Canal Block, Anatomy

Keywords

ASIS, ADDUCTOR CANAL, BLOCK

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to define the starting and ending points of the adductor canal in adductor canal block (ACB) applications through distance measurements relative to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the adductor tubercle. These measurements are performed using ultrasound (USG) and correlated with cadaveric data. Key research questions addressed include: * Can the start and end points of the adductor canal be formulated along a line drawn between the ASIS and the adductor tubercle? * Is there a definable relationship between the block application site and anatomical landmarks such as the vastoadductor membrane (VAM), the apex of the femoral triangle, and other adjacent structures that facilitates localization? By validating ultrasound measurements with cadaveric findings, the study aims to provide researchers with a more predictable and reliable method for determining the optimal site for adductor canal block administration.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to define the starting and ending points of the adductor canal (AC) in the context of adductor canal block (ACB) applications, through distance measurements related to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and adductor tubercle. These measurements are performed in two different planes: the first plane is along an imaginary line drawn between the ASIS and the femoral adductor tubercle, while the second plane is formed by the line between the ASIS and the base of the patella. In these planes, distances were measured between the following points: The distance between the adductor tubercle and ASIS, The distance between ASIS and the base of the patella, The distance between ASIS and the apex of the patella, The distance between the midpoint of the inguinal fold and the base of the patella. In patients, ultrasound was used to identify and mark the following anatomical points: The apex of the iliopectineal fossa, The first visible point of the vastoadductor membrane (VAM), The point where the sartorius muscle ends with the intersection of the adductor longus and begins its contact with the edge of the adductor magnus point The point where the adductor hiatus is located. Additionally, in patients where visible, the descending genicular artery was also marked. The position of the femoral artery in relation to the VAM (medial, middle, or lateral) was noted, as well as the location where the femoral artery intersects the adductor magnus and sartorius, and the depth from the skin to the adductor hiatus. Circumferential measurements of the thigh were also taken at these points. Some of the data obtained was compared with anatomical measurements obtained through cadaveric dissection. Key Research Questions Where are the starting and ending points of the adductor canal? Can the adductor canal be defined along a line drawn between the ASIS and the adductor tubercle? Is there a definable relationship between the block application site and anatomical landmarks such as the vastoadductor membrane (VAM), the apex of the femoral triangle, and other adjacent structures that facilitate localization? By validating ultrasound measurements with cadaveric findings, the study aims to provide researchers with a more predictable and reliable method for determining the optimal site for adductor canal block applications

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

ASA 1-2-3 patients BMI \<35 Ages 18-65 Those willing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Those unwilling to participate in the study Pregnant women BMI \>35 ASA 4-5-6 patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
location of the adductor canalPerioperative/PeriproceduralDetermine the location of the adductor canal on an imaginary line drawn between the anterior superior iliac spine and the adductor tubercle..

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determining the entry point for adductor canal blockPerioperative/PeriproceduralStandardization of the entry point for adductor canal block by defining the relationship of the canal to other structures
Adductor Canal neighborhoodsPerioperative/PeriproceduralDetection of the canal by imaging the Vasto adductor membrane
cadaver dissectionPerioperative/PeriproceduralDetermining the compatibility of the data obtained in ultrasonographic imaging with the real anatomical structures after cadaver dissection
adductor canalPerioperative/Periproceduralmeasuring adductor canal length

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactYasin USTA, M.D.
dryasinusta@gmail.com+905542356313
Backup ContactMüge Çakırca, Ass Professor
mugecakirca@gmail.com+905054433177

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026