Skip to content

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Home-Based Exercise for Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Home-Based Exercise in Patients With Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears: A Prospective Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07246434
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-11-24
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2024-07-31
Last updated
2025-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries, Shoulder Joint, Shoulder Pain

Brief summary

This study evaluates the clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections compared with a home-based exercise program in patients with partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon. Partial supraspinatus tears are a common cause of chronic shoulder pain and functional limitation. PRP has been proposed as a biological treatment that may promote tissue healing, while therapeutic exercise remains a standard conservative intervention. This prospective, controlled study includes two parallel groups. The PRP group receives three monthly ultrasound-guided intratendinous PRP injections, preceded by local anesthesia. The control group follows a structured home-based exercise program for the same overall treatment period. All participants are assessed at baseline and again two months after completing their assigned intervention. The primary outcome is shoulder pain measured with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include shoulder range of motion (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation) and functional disability measured with the Constant-Murley Score. The study also analyzes whether patient characteristics such as age or sex are associated with clinical improvement. The aim of this research is to compare two commonly used conservative treatment strategies and provide evidence to guide clinical decision-making for patients with partial-thickness supraspinatus tears.

Interventions

Ultrasound-guided intratendinous injection of 4 mL PRP prepared from autologous blood using the BS PRP SYSTEM-20 kit. A total of three injections are administered at one-month intervals. Local anesthesia with 5 mL mepivacaine 2% is applied subacromially prior to PRP administration.

OTHERHome Exercise Program

A supervised-prescribed home-based shoulder exercise program including mobility, strengthening, and scapular stabilization exercises. The program is performed regularly over approximately three months, with progression based on clinical guidelines for rotator cuff rehabilitation.

Sponsors

Universidad de Extremadura
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Two-group prospective controlled design comparing PRP injections with a home-based exercise program in parallel arms.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 20 and 70 years. Shoulder pain for more than 6 months with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score \> 4. Partial-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon confirmed by ultrasound. No improvement in VAS after conservative treatment with NSAIDs and/or physical therapy during the previous 6 months. Willingness to undergo blood extraction and PRP infiltrations as required by the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 20 or \> 70 years. Full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon. Active infection (osteomyelitis, septic arthritis). Current treatment with NSAIDs, antiplatelet agents, or systemic immunosuppressants. Severe thrombocytopenia. Positive serology (syphilis, HIV, HBV, HCV).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder Pain (VAS)Baseline and 2 months after completing the intervention.Pain intensity measured using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Higher scores indicate greater pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder Range of Motion (Flexion, Extension, Abduction, Adduction, Internal and External Rotation)Baseline and 2 months after completing the intervention.Active shoulder range of motion measured using standard goniometry in degrees.
Constant-Murley ScoreBaseline and 2 months post-intervention.Composite functional score assessing pain, daily activities, range of motion, and strength. Total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better shoulder function.
Roles and Maudsley ScoreBaseline and 2 months post-intervention.Four-point scale evaluating patient-perceived outcome (1 = excellent, 4 = poor).
QuickDASH ScoreBaseline and 2 months post-intervention.Disability and symptoms of the upper limb measured with the QuickDASH questionnaire (0-100 scale). Higher scores indicate greater disability.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026