Skip to content

Leadless Pacemaker Registry: Outcomes and Follow-up From the University Hospital of St. Pölten

Leadless Pacemaker Registry

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07246135
Acronym
LPR
Enrollment
700
Registered
2025-11-24
Start date
2015-06-18
Completion date
2035-01-31
Last updated
2025-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Leadless Pacemaker, Pacemaker, Registries

Keywords

Registry, Leadless Pacemaker, Pacemaker, Cardiac Pacing, Pacemaker Complication, Leadless Pacemaker Outcomes, Heart Conduction System Disease, Bradycardia

Brief summary

The registry for leadless pacemakers will collect and annually analyze the data of all leadless pacemaker implantations at the University Hospital St. Pölten, including demographic information, indications, procedural details, acute, medium- and long-term complications during follow-up. Due to the partially novel nature of the signals (atrial mechanical sensing markers) and the lack of long-term experience to date, data on these aspects will also be collected and analyzed. This is a single-center, prospective and retrospective registry that includes all patients receiving a leadless pacing device, as well as all patients who received a leadless pacing device between January 2021 and the start of the registry. All patients undergoing implantation of a leadless pacemaker will be invited to participate in the registry. For patients to be included retrospectively, participation in the registry will be offered at the time of their next routine follow-up visit. The indication for leadless pacing will be determined by the physician responsible for the patient. Enrollment in the registry will in no case alter or influence the treatment the patient receives. Data collection will take place at the time of implantation and continuously during follow-up over the entire study period. Pacemaker-related data may be obtained either in person or via remote monitoring.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital St. Polten
CollaboratorOTHER
Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing implantation of a leadless pacemaker at the University Hospital of St. Pölten * Patients who previously received a leadless pacemaker between June 2015 and the start of the registry (retrospective inclusion). * Age ≥ 18 years. * Written informed consent provided by the patient.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who decline or are unable to provide informed consent. * Patients in whom a conventional transvenous pacemaker is implanted (i.e., not leadless). * Any condition that, in the opinion of the treating physician, precludes participation in the registry.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural success ratePeriprocedural / at Day 1Successful implantation of a leadless pacemaker with acceptable electrical parameters and no need for conversion to a transvenous system
Incidence of acute complicationsWithin 30 days after implantationRate of periprocedural complications (e.g., vascular complications, arrhythmias, pericardial effusion, device dislodgement)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause mortalityThroughout follow-up (up to 10 years)
Hospitalizations related to cardiac arrhythmias or heart failureThroughout follow-up (up to 10 years)
Quality of Life after Implantation1 year after Implantation (±2 weeks), every 12th month (±2 weeks) thereafterChange in 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) questionnaire score / The SF-12 questionnaire is a validated health-related quality of life instrument with two subscales: Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Each subscale ranges from 0 to 100 points, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Device-related complication rate (medium- and long-term)Up to 10 years after implantationCumulative incidence of complications requiring medical or surgical intervention (e.g., device malfunction, infection, need for extraction, upgrade)
Left ventricular ejection fraction on Echocardiography1 year after Implantation (±2 weeks), every 12th month (±2 weeks) thereafterin %
Left ventricular dimensions on Echocardiography1 year after Implantation (±2 weeks), every 12th month (±2 weeks) thereafterend-diastolic and end-systolic diameters, in mm
Right ventricular function on Echocardiography1 year after Implantation (±2 weeks), every 12th month (±2 weeks) thereafterTricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) in mm
Electrical performance of the deviceDay 1, 3 months post-implant (±2 weeks), 1 year after Implantation (±2 weeks), every 12th month (±2 weeks) thereafterPacing thresholds (in Volts at 0.24 ms pulse width)
Ventricular pacing burdenDay 1, 3 months post-implant (±2 weeks), 1 year after Implantation (±2 weeks), every 12th month (±2 weeks) thereafterPercentage of ventricular pacing and triggered pacing as recorded by device interrogation

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactMatthias Granner, MD
matthias.granner@stpoelten.lknoe.at+432742900422632
Backup ContactDepartment of Internal Medicine III
interne3@stpolten.lknoe.at+432742900412541

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026