Skip to content

Conventional Physical Therapy Action Observation Therapy on Freezing of Gait and Functional Mobility in Parkinson's Disease

Effects Of Conventional Physical Therapy With And Without Action Observation Therapy On Freezing Of Gait And Functional Mobility In Participants With Parkinson's Disease: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07244900
Enrollment
42
Registered
2025-11-24
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2024-07-01
Last updated
2026-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuro-Degenerative Disease, Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Parkinson's Disease, Balance, Freezing of Gait, Mobility, Function

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to determine the effects of action observation therapy with conventional physical therapy on freezing gait and functional limitation in participants with Parkinson's disease.

Detailed description

Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by rigidity, tremors, and bradykinesia, along with non-motor dysfunction. The exercise rehabilitation has a positive impact on motor and non-motor functions in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Conventional physical therapy (CPT) that involves isometric exercises, stretching techniques, and strength and balance training is useful to improve the severity of functional mobility and freezing of gait. In action observation therapy (AOT), small video clips of different goal-directed tasks were added to rehabilitation to determine the combined effects on outcome.

Interventions

OTHERConventional Physical Therapy

Group A received conventional physical therapy treatment. The CPT program consists of isometric exercises, stretching, and strength training based on the patient's physical condition and the severity of functional mobility and freezing of Gait.

OTHERAction Observation plus conventional Physical Therapy

Group B was given action observation therapy with conventional physical therapy treatment. In AOT, the therapist showed small video clips of different goal-directed tasks to participants, and they were asked to follow every step and movement. The therapist maintained the patient's attention with verbal feedback

Sponsors

University of Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This study will use a single-blind masking design, in which the outcome assessor will be blinded to group allocation. Participants and therapists will be aware of the intervention assigned, but the assessor responsible for data collection and analysis will not have access to group assignment information to minimize assessment bias.

Intervention model description

This study follows a parallel group design, involving two groups: a control group and an experimental group. Participants in both groups will receive treatment concurrently but under different conditions. The control group will receive the standard or conventional intervention, while the experimental group will receive the modified or additional treatment being investigated. Comparisons between the groups will be made to evaluate the effectiveness of the experimental intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The participants were included based on the UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank diagnostic criteria, with clinical findings supporting the diagnosis. The eligible participants were 1. Aged between 50 and 80 years, 2. Both genders, 3. UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank diagnostic criteria, labelled as stage ≤ 3, 4. with a minimum of 2 years since being diagnosed with PD and 5. Freezing of gait score of 9 or higher on FOG-Q 6. Able to understand and follow commands.

Exclusion criteria

The

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in functional mobilityThe assessment was made at baseline before the treatment session, and any change in mobility status was observed at the end of 6th week and 12th week after the intervention.The TUG is an efficient test that measures mobility and balance, requiring participants to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back, and sit down. The time taken to complete this sequence is recorded, with longer times indicating potential mobility issues. A score of more than or equal to fourteen seconds indicates a high risk of falls.
Change in Freezing of gaitThe freezing of gait was assessed at baseline, and any change in it was measured at the end of 6th week and 12th week after the intervention.The FOG-Q is a reliable tool for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment intervention on FOG for Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire consists of 6 items designed to assess the severity of freezing of gait. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale, with '0' indicating no symptoms and '4' indicating the most severe symptoms. The total score can range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater severity of freezing of gait.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORIshfaq Ahmed, PhD Physiotherapy

University of Lahore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 17, 2026