Skip to content

Aescin-Based Herbal Extract (Reparil) for Postoperative Sequelae After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

Evaluation of Aescin-Based Herbal Extracts for Managing Postoperative Sequelae Following Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07244029
Acronym
Reparil
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-11-24
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2026-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain, Facial Swelling, Trismus

Keywords

Aescin, Escin, Reparil, Ibuprofen, Herbal anti-inflammatory, Postoperative sequelae, Third molar extraction, Oral surgery, Phytotherapeutic agents, Pain management

Brief summary

This randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Aescin-based herbal extract (Reparil®) compared with Ibuprofen in managing postoperative sequelae following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. A total of 100 participants aged 18-40 years will be enrolled at the Dental Center, Medical City Hospital for Military and Security Services (MCMSS), Al Khoud, Oman. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Reparil® (Aescin 20 mg, three times daily for five days) or Ibuprofen (400 mg, three times daily for five days) following standardized third molar extraction procedures. Postoperative outcomes including pain (VAS), facial swelling (3D facial scanner), and mouth opening (digital caliper) will be assessed preoperatively, on day 2, and day 7 post-surgery. The study aims to determine whether Aescin offers comparable analgesic and anti-edematous effects to Ibuprofen with fewer adverse events.

Detailed description

The extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is one of the most common oral surgical procedures and is frequently associated with pain, facial swelling, and trismus. These postoperative sequelae result from an acute inflammatory response triggered by surgical trauma. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), particularly Ibuprofen, are widely prescribed for symptom control but are often associated with gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular adverse effects. Hence, safer alternatives with comparable efficacy are being investigated. Aescin, a natural saponin derived from Aesculus hippocastanum (horse chestnut), exhibits anti-inflammatory, anti-edematous, and venotonic properties. It acts by stabilizing capillary membranes, reducing vascular permeability, and inhibiting the release of inflammatory mediators such as histamine and prostaglandins. Reparil tablets containing Aescin have been clinically validated for treating soft tissue edema and chronic venous insufficiency but have not been extensively evaluated in oral surgical applications. This prospective, single-center, randomized, single-blind controlled trial will compare the postoperative efficacy of Aescin (Reparil) versus Ibuprofen in patients undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) into two treatment groups using computer-generated allocation with pharmacist-controlled concealment. Both the operator and the outcome assessor will be blinded to treatment allocation. Pain intensity will be measured using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Facial swelling will be objectively assessed using a 3D facial scanner (Revopoint POP 3), and trismus will be measured as the maximum interincisal distance. Assessments will be performed at baseline, postoperative day 2, and day 7. A rescue analgesic (diclofenac sodium 50 mg) will be provided for uncontrolled pain. All data will be recorded via EpiData version 4.6, with statistical analysis conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 30.0. The primary endpoint is postoperative pain reduction; secondary endpoints include facial edema, trismus improvement, and adverse drug effects. This study will contribute to evidence on the use of herbal-based anti-inflammatory agents as potential alternatives to conventional NSAIDs in oral surgery.

Interventions

DRUGEscin

Oral administration of Aescin 20 mg (Reparil®-Dragees, Meda Pharmaceuticals, Germany), taken three times daily (TID) for five consecutive days following surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar. Each tablet contains 20 mg of purified Aescin derived from Aesculus hippocastanum.

DRUGIbuprofen 400 mg

Oral administration of Ibuprofen 400 mg tablets (Flamingo Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India), taken three times daily (TID) for five consecutive days following surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar.

Sponsors

Oman Medical Speciality Board
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Single-masked: the care provider (surgeon) and the outcomes assessor are blinded to group allocation. Participants are not blinded due to differences in appearance of study medications. Allocation concealment is maintained by coded medication packs prepared by an independent pharmacist.

Intervention model description

Two-arm, parallel-group, randomized, single-blind controlled clinical trial comparing Reparil (Aescin 20 mg TID) versus Ibuprofen 400 mg TID following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients indicated for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Age between 18 and 40 years. Impacted mandibular third molars with similar anatomical position and difficulty level as classified by Pell and Gregory and Pederson scoring. Healthy individuals (ASA I-II) with no significant systemic illness. Willing to provide written informed consent and attend all follow-up visits (Day 2 and Day 7 post-surgery).

Exclusion criteria

* Recent use (within three weeks preoperatively) of anti-inflammatories, corticosteroids, or antibiotics. Known allergies or hypersensitivity to Aescin, Ibuprofen, rescue medications, or local anesthetics. Pregnant or lactating women. Patients with contraindications to NSAIDs (e.g., asthma, bleeding disorders, chronic kidney disease, active peptic ulcer, or cardiovascular disease). Recent use of substances that may affect surgery or interact with study drugs (e.g., contraceptives, alcohol, or tobacco). Surgical time exceeding 30 minutes or cases with intraoperative complications requiring non-study medications.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain intensityBaseline, Day 2, and Day 7 post-surgeryChange in pain intensity measured using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline (preoperative), postoperative day 2, and postoperative day 7 following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mouth opening (trismus)Baseline, Day 2, and Day 7 post-surgeryChange in maximum interincisal distance (in millimeters) measured using a digital caliper at baseline (preoperative), postoperative day 2, and postoperative day 7 following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Facial swelling (edema)Baseline, Day 2, and Day 7 post-surgeryChange in postoperative facial volume measured using a 3D facial scanner (Revopoint POP 3). Measurements will be taken at baseline (preoperative), postoperative day 2, and postoperative day 7 to assess the degree of facial edema following impacted mandibular third molar surgery.
Adverse effectsBaseline to Day 7 post-surgeryAny drug-related or postoperative adverse effects observed or reported by participants within the 7-day postoperative period will be recorded.

Countries

Oman

Contacts

Primary ContactSuhail H AlSamari, BDS, MFD
suhail.dental@gmail.com+968 97366511
Backup ContactVidya Shetty, BDS, MDS
shettyvidya007@gmail.com+968 93681986

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026