Skip to content

Effect of Irrigation Solution Temperature on Clinical Outcomes and Salivary CRP After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

Effect of Irrigation Solution Temperature on Clinical Outcomes and Salivary CRP After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07243210
Enrollment
14
Registered
2025-11-21
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2025-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

C-REACTIVE PROTEIN, Postoperative Complications, Third Molar Surgery

Brief summary

Surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars often requires bone removal using rotary instruments, in which friction between the bur and bone generates heat. Excessive temperature rise may lead to local bone necrosis, delayed healing, and increased postoperative complications. Continuous irrigation with saline solution is routinely performed to reduce heat generation, and cold saline irrigation (0-4℃) has been shown to provide better thermal control than room-temperature saline. This study aims to evaluate the effect of cold saline irrigation compared with room-temperature saline irrigation on postoperative outcomes following impacted mandibular third molar surgery. The assessed parameters include pain, swelling, trismus, and salivary C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as a biomarker of inflammation. Salivary CRP serves as a minimally invasive marker that reflects the systemic inflammatory response after surgery. This randomized controlled trial will be conducted at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City. Eligible patients with bilateral impacted mandibular third molars will be enrolled. Each patient will undergo extraction of one tooth with cold saline irrigation (0-4℃) and the contralateral tooth with room-temperature saline irrigation. Postoperative outcomes will include pain intensity (VAS) on days 1, 2, and 7; facial swelling on days 1, 2, and 7; trismus on days 1, 2, and 7; and salivary CRP levels at baseline and postoperative day 2. The findings are expected to clarify the role of irrigation solution temperature in both subjective clinical outcomes and objective inflammatory markers, thereby providing evidence to optimize clinical protocols and reduce postoperative morbidity in third molar surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDURECold Saline Irrigation

During surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, bone removal and irrigation will be performed using sterile saline cooled to 0-4°C to minimize heat generation

PROCEDURERoom-Temperature Saline Irrigation (Control)

During surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, bone removal and irrigation will be performed using sterile saline at room temperature (approximately 25°C). This procedure serves as the control to compare the effects of irrigation temperature on postoperative outcomes.

Sponsors

University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy patients with an ASA physical status classification of I or II. * Patients with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars of comparable difficulty, with an angulation difference between the two teeth not exceeding 15 degrees, confirmed by clinical and panoramic radiographic examination. * Patients who have provided written informed consent after being fully informed about the study purpose and procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients presenting with systemic or local acute inflammation or infection at the surgical site. * Patients with systemic diseases contraindicating surgical tooth extraction. * Patients with a history of corticosteroid or anti-inflammatory drug use within 3 weeks prior to participation. * Patients with clinical or radiographic signs suggestive of tumors (benign or malignant) associated with or adjacent to the impacted mandibular third molar.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Facial SwellingBaseline (preoperative) and postoperative days 1, 2, and 7Facial swelling will be assessed by measuring three linear distances between standard facial landmarks: (1) tragus to pogonion, (2) gonion to lateral canthus, and (3) gonion to commissure. Postoperative swelling is measured as the change in facial dimension at each time point compared with the baseline measurement.
Postoperative PainDay 1, Day 2, and Day 7 after surgeryPostoperative pain will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain.
TrismusBaseline (preoperative) and postoperative days 1, 2, and 7Trismus will be evaluated by measuring the maximum interincisal distance (in millimeters) between the incisal edges of the upper and lower central incisors using a calibrated caliper. The degree of trismus will be determined by the reduction in mouth opening compared with the baseline (preoperative) measurement.
Salivary C-Reactive Protein (sCRP) LevelsBaseline and postoperative day 2Salivary C-reactive protein (sCRP) levels will be quantified using the ELISA method following the manufacturer's protocol

Countries

Vietnam

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 16, 2026