Balance Assessment, Low Back Pain, Spondylolisthesis, Spondylosis Lumbar
Conditions
Keywords
biodex, balance, subcategories of low back pain
Brief summary
this study aims to evaluate balance using the biodex balance system among patients with spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and lumber disc prolapse.
Detailed description
Low back pain is one of the most common causes of disability globally . While postural balance impairments have been widely documented in individuals with low back pain, there is limited understanding of how these impairments vary across specific subcategories of specific low back pain. Low back pain is generally categorized into non specific and specific types. Non-specific LBP approximately accounts for 85-90% of all low back pain cases (Hartvigsen et al., 2018). In contrast, specific low back pain arises from a recognizable pathology such as structural abnormalities. The most common causes of specific low back pain are lumbar spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbar disc prolapse. Lumbar spondylosis has a prevalence of 74% in individuals over 60 years confirmed with radiographic findings. Spondylolisthesis affects approximately 6-11.5% of adults , lumbar disc prolapse accounts for 2-5% of all low back pain cases. Balance deficiency among patients with spondylosis, spondylolisthesis and lumber disc prolapse was reported in literature by different objective assessment tools. Individuals with low back pain exhibit measurable deficits in balance and postural stability compared to healthy controls . Also, the chronicity of low back pain affects both static and dynamic balance. Assessment and detection of balance deficiency among patients with spondylosis, spondylolisthesis and lumber disc prolapse will allow physical therapists to design individualized rehabilitation programs. Improve understanding of interventions focusing on core stabilization, proprioceptive retraining and dynamic balance. This may improve postural control, enhance gait performance, reduce fall risk and support better functional outcomes in daily activities. Thus, there was a need to study the difference in balance using the biodex balance system among patients with spondylosis, spondylolisthesis and lumber disc prolapse. The current study may provide a more conclusive insight in evaluation and treatment of patients with low back pain.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAssessment of balance will be measured by The Biodex Balance System (BBS) which computes Postural Stability key indices: the medial-lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior-posterior stability index
Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and is often associated with postural and balance impairments. However, limited evidence exists on how these deficits differ among specific types of LBP such as lumbar spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and disc prolapse. Understanding these variations is crucial for accurate assessment and targeted rehabilitation. Evaluating balance using the Biodex Balance System can help identify the extent of impairment and guide physiotherapists in developing individualized rehabilitation programs that enhance postural control, stability, and functional performance, ultimately improving quality of life and reducing fall risk among LBP patients.
Sponsors
Delta University for Science and Technology
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
Assessment of balance will be measured by The Biodex Balance System (BBS) which computes Postural Stability key indices: the medial-lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior-posterior stability index (APSI), and overall stability index (OSI). Each index is further measured in four outcomes: Double leg eyes open (DLEO), Double leg eyes closed (DLEC), Single leg eye open (SLEO) for both legs and Single leg eye closed (SLEC) for both legs. Additionally Biodex Balance Systen (BBS) will assess limit of stability in one outcome: Double leg eyes open (DLEO).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of chronic low back pain (≥3 months duration) (Ge et al., 2021). Referred from orthopedic surgeons with confirmed diagnosis of lumbar spondylosis, spondylolisthesis or lumber disc prolapse affecting L4-L5 or L5 S1( Hlaing et al., 2020) depending on imaging findings (MRI, CT or X-ray scan within the last 6 months): * Lumbar spondylosis; defined as degenerative disc disease, osteophyte formation with or without facet joint arthropathy (Natarajan et al., 2021; Christe et al., 2020). * Lumbar spondylolisthesis; defined as anterolisthesis of one vertebral body over another, graded via the Meyerding scale (grade 1 or 2) (Giordan et al., 2023; Chuang et al., 2018). * Lumbar disc prolapse; defined as protrusion, herniation of intervertebral disc (Kang et al., 2016; Hahne et al., 2019). * Age of patients ranges from 35 to 55 years (Albeshri, et.al., 2017) * Both genders will be included in the study * Pain intensity: ≥ 4/10 on a numerical pain rating scale (Thong et al., 2011). * BMI ranged from (18.5-29.9 kg/m²) (Karimi et al., 2008; Soliman et al., 2017). * Healthy subjects are healthy volunteers and without any Musculoskeletal disorders (Karimi et al., 2008).
Exclusion criteria
* The following patients will be excluded from the study patients with: * Prior lumbar spine surgery or neurological disorders (e.g., parkinson's, stroke) that may influence balance (soliman et al., 2017). * Fractures of the spine, pelvis or lower extremities, (Karimi et al., 2008). * Leg length discrepancy(Karimi et al., 2008). * Systemic disease such as arthritis, tuberculosis, liver or kidney failure. (Karimi et al., 2008). * Patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. * Patients exhibiting red flag symptoms such as urinary or fecal incontinence, saddle anesthesia, progressive motor deficits (e.g., foot drop), or other signs of serious neurological compromis (Ruhe et al., 2011). * Participants experiencing low back pain with pain radiating distaly below the level of knee (Hlaing et al., 2020).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Postural stability ( Overall Stability Index) | All postural assessments will be performed for 20 seconds | Postural stability will be assessed using the Biodex Balance System through the Overall Stability Index (OSI).The OSI reflects the degree of platform sway, with lower values indicating better balance control. Measurements will be taken under six standardized conditions to evaluate both static and dynamic balance performance. These conditions include: Double-Leg, Eyes Open (DLEO) Double-Leg, Eyes Closed (DLEC) Single-Leg, Eyes Open (SLEO) - Dominant Leg Single-Leg, Eyes Closed (SLEC) - Dominant Leg Single-Leg, Eyes Open (SLEO) - Non-Dominant Leg Single-Leg, Eyes Closed (SLEC) - Non-Dominant Leg |
| Postural Stability: Medial-Lateral Stability Index (MLSI) | All postural assessments will be performed for 20 seconds | The Medial-Lateral Stability Index (MLSI) will be obtained from the Biodex Balance System to assess side-to-side postural control. Higher MLSI values indicate greater medial-lateral sway, while lower values reflect better stability in the frontal plane. the measurement will be in six conditions: Double leg eyes open (DLEO), Double leg eyes closed (DLEC), Single leg eye open (SLEO) Dominant leg, Single leg eye closed (SLEC) Dominant leg, Single leg eye open (SLEO) Non-Dominant leg and Single leg eye closed (SLEC) Non-Dominant leg |
| postural stability: Anterior-Posterior Stability Index (APSI) | All postural assessments will be performed for 20 seconds | The Anterior-Posterior Stability Index (APSI) will be measured using the Biodex Balance System to evaluate forward-backward postural control. Lower APSI values indicate improved stability in the sagittal plane, whereas higher values reflect increased anterior-posterior sway. the measurement will be in six conditions: Double leg eyes open (DLEO), Double leg eyes closed (DLEC), Single leg eye open (SLEO) Dominant leg, Single leg eye closed (SLEC) Dominant leg, Single leg eye open (SLEO) Non-Dominant leg and Single leg eye closed (SLEC) Non-Dominant leg |
| Limits of Stability | All postural assessments will be performed for 20 seconds | Limits of Stability will be assessed using the Biodex Balance System to evaluate the participant's ability to intentionally shift their center of gravity toward predefined targets without losing balance. The test measures directional control, reaction time, movement speed, and endpoint accuracy, with higher scores reflecting better dynamic balance and voluntary postural control. the measurement condition will be in Double leg eyes open (DLEO) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Arabic version of Numerical pain rating scale (Ar-NPRS) | Periprocedural | The Numerical Rating Scale is used to quantify the intensity of a subjective symptom-most commonly pain-on a 0 to 10 scale. A score of 0 represents no pain or no symptom, while a score of 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain or maximum symptom severity. Higher scores reflect a worse outcome, indicating greater intensity. |
| Arabic version of Oswestry disability index (Ar-ODI) | Periprocedural | The arabic Oswestry Disability Index is a questionnaire used to assess disability related to low back pain. Scores range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no disability and 100 indicates maximum disability. Higher scores represent a worse outcome, reflecting greater functional limitation. |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactMuhammed E Abulftouh
Backup ContactRewan M Aloush
Outcome results
None listed