Skip to content

Comparison of Manual Acupuncture at Distal Acupoints Versus Electroacupuncture at Local Acupoints in Patients With Acute Neck Pain Due to Cervical Spondylosis

A Randomized Controlled Single-blind Clinical Trial Comparing the Therapeutic Effects of Manual Acupuncture at Distal Acupoints With Electroacupuncture at Local Acupoints in Patients With Acute Neck Pain Due to Cervical Spondylosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07240623
Acronym
DALA
Enrollment
124
Registered
2025-11-21
Start date
2024-09-25
Completion date
2025-05-15
Last updated
2025-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Neck Pain, Cervical Spondylosis, Degenerative Cervical Spine, Neck Pain Musculoskeletal

Brief summary

This study is a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial involving two groups: manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture, with 62 participants in each group. All participants received treatment once daily for 10 consecutive days, combined with at least 10 minutes of active cervical spine exercises per session. Participants were allowed to take one 500 mg tablet of paracetamol if the pain exceeded their tolerance threshold, with a minimum interval of 6 hours between doses and a maximum daily dose of 1,500 mg. The number of tablets taken each day was recorded. No other analgesic interventions were permitted during the study period. The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of the two interventions in improving pain intensity (VAS score) and limitations of cervical range of motion after each treatment session. In addition, adverse events were monitored and recorded after every intervention.

Interventions

PROCEDUREManual acupuncture at distal acupoints

Manual acupuncture applied for 25 minutes at distal acupoints selected based on meridian diagnosis (SI3, SI5, TE4, BL60, BL62, GB40) on the contralateral side of the pain. During needle retention, participants performed active cervical spine movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation) for at least 10 minutes.

PROCEDUREElectroacupuncture at local acupoints

Electroacupuncture applied for 25 minutes at local acupoints (GB20-SI15 and GB21-LU7) on the painful side. After needle removal, participants performed active cervical spine movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation) for at least 10 minutes.

Sponsors

School of Medicine - Vietnam National University at Ho Chi Minh city
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute onset of neck pain lasting less than 6 weeks. * Pain intensity ≥ 50 mm on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). * Presence of limitation in at least one cervical range of motion (ROM). * Radiographic diagnosis of cervical spondylosis based on Kellgren and Lawrence criteria.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with infection, cachexia, or psychiatric disorders. * Currently using analgesic medication. * Cervical movement limitation persisting for more than 6 weeks. * History of or indication for cervical spine surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain intensity (VAS score)Baseline and after each daily treatment for 10 consecutive daysPain intensity is assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where ≤4 indicates no pain and 100 indicates the worst imaginable pain. The change in VAS score from baseline to each treatment day is recorded for comparison between groups.
Change in cervical range of motion (ROM) limitation scoreBaseline and after each daily treatment for 10 consecutive daysThe cervical range of motion (ROM) was measured for six movements: flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion, and right and left rotation. Each movement was assessed using a goniometer, and the measured angles were converted into a limitation score ranging from 0 to 4 according to the following grading system: * 0 - Normal ROM (flexion 45°-55°, extension 60°-70°, lateral flexion 40°-50°, rotation 60°-70°) * 1 - Mild limitation (flexion 40°-44°, extension 55°-59°, lateral flexion 35°-39°, rotation 55°-59°) * 2 - Moderate limitation (flexion 35°-39°, extension 50°-54°, lateral flexion 30°-34°, rotation 50°-54°) * 3 - Severe limitation (flexion 30°-34°, extension 45°-49°, lateral flexion 25°-29°, rotation 45°-49°) * 4 - Very severe limitation (\<30° flexion, \<45° extension, \<25° lateral flexion, \<45° rotation) The total limitation score was calculated as the sum of all six movement scores, with higher scores indicating greater cervical movement restriction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events related to acupuncture or electroacupunctureMonitored immediately after each treatment session and at the end of the 10-day treatment periodAny adverse events such as local pain, swelling, dizziness, or fainting were observed and recorded after each treatment session. Severity and frequency were summarized descriptively.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of paracetamol tablets usedRecorded daily during the 10-day treatment periodParticipants were allowed to take one 500 mg tablet of paracetamol at ≥6-hour intervals if the pain exceeded their tolerance, with a maximum dose of 1500 mg/day. The number of tablets used per day was recorded.

Countries

Vietnam

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026