Assessing the Turkish DDIVAT for Visual Acuity Measurement

Astigmatism, Hyperopia, Myopia, Refractive Errors, Visual Acuity

Visual Acuity, Refractive Errors

The goal of this observational methodological study is to validate the Turkish version of the DDIVAT visual acuity measuring device in a Turkish-speaking adult population. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the Turkish version of the DDIVAT provide reliable and valid visual acuity measurements in Turkish speakers? Are the results of the DDIVAT comparable to those obtained with the standard Snellen chart used in clinical practice? Researchers will compare DDIVAT visual acuity test results with Snellen chart results to see if both methods produce consistent measurements. Participants will: Be adults aged 18 years or older, including both patients and healthy volunteers. Undergo visual acuity testing using the DDIVAT system displayed on a smart TV connected to the university server. Have their visual acuity re-measured using the standard Snellen optotype under the same conditions. No medication or invasive procedure will be used. The study carries no risk to participants.

This study is a non-interventional, observational methodological validation study designed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the DDIVAT (Digital Distance Interactive Visual Acuity Test) in a Turkish-speaking population. The DDIVAT visual acuity test was originally developed and validated at Democritus University of Thrace (Greece) and has been approved by the National Medicines Organization as a Class I medical device. The current study aims to determine whether the Turkish-translated version of this visual acuity measurement tool performs consistently and accurately among Turkish-speaking participants. Visual acuity is one of the most fundamental components of a comprehensive ophthalmological examination. It measures the clarity or sharpness of vision, which can be influenced by refractive errors and a variety of ocular diseases. Accurate and accessible tools for measuring visual acuity are therefore essential in both clinical and research settings. In this study, 200 adult participants (aged 18 years and older) will be recruited from Trakya University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology (Edirne, Türkiye). The study population will include both healthy volunteers and patients presenting to the ophthalmology clinic. Each participant will undergo two visual acuity measurements under standardized conditions: DDIVAT visual acuity test (Turkish version), administered via a smart TV connected to the university's secure server. Snellen chart test, which represents the standard clinical practice currently used at Trakya University Hospital. Measurements will be taken monocularly (each eye tested separately) while participants wear their current optical correction (e.g., eyeglasses or contact lenses). The study will compare the two measurement methods to determine: The level of agreement between DDIVAT and Snellen test results. The test-retest reliability of the Turkish DDIVAT. Since no medication, invasive procedure, or experimental intervention will be applied, the study poses no potential risk to participants. All procedures will comply with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) principles, and relevant data protection regulations. Collected data will be stored anonymously and used solely for research purposes. The findings are expected to provide evidence supporting the use of DDIVAT as a reliable digital visual acuity tool for Turkish-speaking populations, enhancing accessibility and standardization of visual testing in both clinical and teleophthalmology contexts.

No related papers found yet.