Skip to content

Endo-ePIcardial Versus Endocardial Only Catheter Ablation for ISchemic Driven Ventricular Tachycardia (EPISODE VT)

Endo-ePIcardial Versus Endocardial Only Catheter Ablation for ISchemic Driven Ventricular Tachycardia (EPISODE VT) - Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07240441
Acronym
EPISODE_VT
Enrollment
220
Registered
2025-11-20
Start date
2025-02-03
Completion date
2030-11-30
Last updated
2025-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ablation, Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Ventricular Tachycardias

Keywords

ventricular tachycardia, myocardial infarction, epicardial access, pericardial sac puncture, ablation, implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Brief summary

The EPISODE VT trial is designed to compare efficacy and safety of two modalities for interventional treatment - endocardial ablation and endo-epicardial ablation in a population of patients with post myocardial infarction (ICD 10 - I25.2) ventricular tachycardias (ICD 10 - I47.2), who are protected by an implantable cardioverter-defibrilator (ICD) and meet study inclusion criteria.

Detailed description

The EPISODE VT trial is designed to compare efficacy and safety of two modalities for interventional treatment - endocardial ablation and endo-epicardial ablation in a population of patients with post myocardial infarction (ICD 10 - I25.2) ventricular tachycardias (ICD 10 - I47.2), who are protected by an implantable cardioverter-defibrilator (ICD) and meet study inclusion criteria. Nowadays, most often ablation is performed using only endocardial approach. The rate of VT recurrences after such ablation may exceed 50%, which is largely due to the inability to remove all arrhythmogenic substrate. At the same time, in cases where all potentially arrhythmogenic substrate is removed, the immediate and long-term results are better, both in terms of recurrence and prognosis. Single reports on endo-epicardial ablation as the first-line therapy in patients with post-infarction VT indicate a higher efficacy of this approach compared to endocardial ablation. Similar conclusions emerge from meta-analyses. This is probably due to a more complete removal of the arrhythmogenic substrate located mainly in the epicardium or intramurally. In the endo-epicardial group pericardial sac puncture will be performed after filling it with carbon dioxide, which creates a space for safe puncture. Ablation procedures will be performed as standard. The electrophysiological systems and ablation electrodes used in the study will be standard devices that research centers are equipped with. Their use will be in accordance with the procedures of the center and the instructions for use.

Interventions

Post-myocardial infarction VT radiofrequency ablation using a standard endocardial approach

PROCEDUREEndo-epicardial VT ablation

Post-myocardial infarction VT radiofrequency ablation using an endo-epicardial approach with pericardial sac puncture preceded by CO2 insufflation

Sponsors

National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical University of Warsaw
CollaboratorOTHER
MEDICOVER SP Z O.O.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Status after myocardial infarction (minimum 3 months before inclusion in the study). * Documented post-infarction VT or VF. * Implantable ICD (at least 2 weeks before ablation) or CRT-D (at least 2 months before ablation). * A history of at least one from below: 1. One or more high energy interventions. 2. Three or more adequate antitachycardia pacing therapies, including one symptomatic. 3. Three or more episodes of VT in 24 hours (interrupted by ATP or shock) - electrical storm. 4. Sustained VT recorded on ECG with a cycle length longer than the ICD detection threshold. * Age between 18 and 85 years. * Signed informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Obesity with BMI \> 40 kg/m2. * Left ventricle ejection fraction \< 20%. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Renal failure (eGFR \< 20 mL/min/1.73m2). * Fresh ballot thrombus in the left ventricle. * Suspicion of massive adhesions in the pericardium that may impede pericardial puncture. * Ablation of the post-infarction VT in the left ventricle in medical history. * Previous heart surgery. * Acute conditions that prevent ablation (including active infection, overt hyperthyroidism and others listed below). * Active neoplastic disease. * Heart failure with NYHA IV. * Life expectancy less than 12 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adequate ICD shock during 24 months of follow-up.2 years
Death from any cause2 yearsDeath from any cause
Electrical storm (3 episodes of VT in 24 hours)2 years

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactDerejko P Prof. Paweł Derejko, MD, PhD
pawel.derejko@medicover.pl+48 603338871
Backup ContactFabijańska M Project Manager for Clinical Trials in Medicover Hospital
magdalena.fabijanska@medicover.pl+48 519532444

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026