Skip to content

Role of the Noradrenergic System in the Regulation of Learning Dynamics: Evaluation of the Effect of a Low-dose Selective Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitor (NOISYXETINE)

Role of the Noradrenergic System in the Regulation of Learning Dynamics: Evaluation of the Effect of a Low-dose Selective Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitor (NOISYXETINE)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07239791
Acronym
NOISYXETINE
Enrollment
160
Registered
2025-11-20
Start date
2025-11-18
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

No Disease or Condition is Being Studied, Role of the Noradrenergic System in the Regulation of Learning Dynamics

Keywords

noradrenaline, learning dynamics, atomoxetine, healthy subject

Brief summary

Administration of low-dose selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (sNRI) (e.g. atomoxetine) to healthy subjects is a validated model of increasing cortical noradrenaline levels which, combined with computational modelling of behaviour, allows fine-grained analysis of the impact on learning processes of noradrenaline's fluctuations in the human cortex. The study goal is to characterize the modifications of certain cognitive processes and associated brain circuits under low-dose sNRI using validated computational learning models. The study will be interested in how subjects will modify their learning under the effect of the drug across two separate investigations; one utilizing in a stable evidence accumulation task and one utilising a changing evidence accumulation task. This approach will help to better understand the link between noradrenaline and accumulation of evidence in healthy subjects, and indirectly in some neuropsychiatric pathologies. The study is a single centre, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study involving evaluable healthy adults separated in 2 cohorts: A for participants having the stable task and B for those having the changing one. Participants will then be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment sequences: * Atomoxetine 40 mg - Placebo (Subgroups A1 or B1); * Placebo - Atomoxetine 40 mg (Subgroups A2 or B2).

Detailed description

Hundred and sixty healthy volunteers will be enrolled (80 / task) in 24 months. The maximum duration of participation for each subject is 51 days.

Interventions

DRUGAtomoxetine

One single capsule of atomoxetine 40 mg given at one visit according to the sequence randomly allocated. Placebo of atomoxetine will be administered at the other visit for the participant (according to the sequence randomly allocated)

DRUGPlacebo

One single capsule of placebo given at one visit according to the sequence randomly allocated.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier St Anne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Single centre, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study involving 160 evaluable healthy adults. Subjects will be separated in 2 cohorts: A for participants having the stable task and B for those having the changing one. They will then be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment sequences: * Atomoxetine 40 mg - Placebo (Subgroups A1 or B1); * Placebo - Atomoxetine 40 mg (Subgroups A2 or B2).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Right-handed, assessed by the Edinburgh scale; * Written signed informed consent; * Subject covered by a social security regimen.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman; * First-degree family history of axis I disorder (DSM-IV-TR), excepted unipolar mood and anxiety disorders with OCD; * Personal history of axis I disorder (DSM-IV-TR) in the 6 months preceding the study entry; * Dependence on a psychoactive substance in the 12 months preceding the study entry, excluding nicotine, any behavioural disorder incompatible with a 2-hour electroencephalographic recording; * Neuro/psychotropic treatment ongoing or stopped less than 1 month ago; * Personal history of neurological pathology (e.g.: congenital malformation, benign or malignant tumour, degenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS), epilepsy, inflammatory or infectious disease of the CNS, etc.); * Personal history of chronic disease of infectious, neoplastic, vascular, dysimmune or inflammatory, metabolic or endocrine, degenerative or genetic aetiology. In particular, angle-closure glaucoma, pheochromocytoma, known high blood pressure or measured blood pressure greater than 140/90 mm Hg at baseline, congenital heart disease, known ischemic heart disease, known heart failure, supraventricular or ventricular heart rhythm disorder, nephropathy, known liver disease and any pathology likely to be aggravated by an increase in blood pressure; * Any medical treatment in the month preceding the study entry, apart from effective contraceptive treatment; * Subject deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision; * Person subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express consent; * Known intolerance to atomoxetine; * Need to wear glasses and/or lenses to obtain normal vision; * Subject in an exclusion period or enrolled in an interventional study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apparent Learning rateFrom Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)Paired difference in the apparent learning rates (in both environmental contexts: stable task and changing task), between the sNRI (atomoxetine) and control (placebo) conditions. Apparent learning rate will be calculate with the following formula: αt=(vt- vt-(1) )/(xt- vt-1) according to Foucault and Meyniel (Foucault C, Meyniel F (2024) Two Determinants of Dynamic Adaptive Learning for Magnitudes and Probabilities. Open Mind : Discov Cogn Sci 8:615-638) The learning rate measures the amount of update of the learned value (from vt-(1 to vt) induced by the observation xt in proportion to its deviation from the previously learned value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the computational modelling of behaviour at Visit 2 (Day 7)From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)Computational modelling of behaviour at Visit 1 and 2: paired difference in latent behavioral parameters of the computational models that characterize the learning process (in a stable accumulation task and in a dynamic accumulation task), between the sNRI (atomoxetine) and control (placebo) conditions.
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire at Visit 2From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)The scores of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire (Spielberger et al., 1983) will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of depression and anxiety. The STAI comprises 2 questionnaires of 20 items with the following ranges: * STAI-YA (state anxiety): 0-80 with 0 equivalent to no anxiety and 80 the worst possible anxiety * STAI-YB (Trait anxiety): 0-80 with 0 equivalent to no anxiety and 80 the worst possible anxiety
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaire at Visit 2From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)The scores of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaire (Beck et al., 1961) will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of depression. The BDI comprises 21 items with the following ranges: 0-63 with 0 equivalent to no depression and 63 the worst possible depression.
Number of adverse eventsFrom Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)Side effects (treatment related adverse events) in all groups between study drug administration at Visit 1 (Day 0) and Visit 2 (Day 7) including vital signs worsening and ECG findings
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) on sadness at Visit 2From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)The scores of the VAS-sadness will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of sadness. The VAS ranges from 0 (no sadness) to 100 mm (worst possible sadness).
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) on fatigue at Visit 2From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)The scores of the VAS-fatigue will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of fatigue. The VAS ranges from 0 (no fatigue) to 100 mm (maximum imaginable fatigue).
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) on anxiety at Visit 2From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)The scores of the VAS-anxiety will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of anxiety. The VAS ranges from 0 (no anxiety) to 100 mm (worst possible anxiety).

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactFlorent Meyniel, MD, PhD
florent.meyniel@ghu-paris.fr+33 1 45 65 63 90

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026