Skip to content

Comparing Two Medicines for Healing Jaw Bone Infections After Root Canal Treatment

Effect of Triple Antibiotic Paste and Calcium Hydroxide on the Rate of Healing of Periapical Lesions in Single-Rooted Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07239739
Enrollment
62
Registered
2025-11-20
Start date
2026-06-15
Completion date
2026-12-15
Last updated
2026-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periapical Lesion, Periapical Periodontitis

Keywords

Triple Antibiotic Paste,, Calcium Hydroxide,, Periapical Healing, Intracanal Medicament

Brief summary

This study compares two commonly used intracanal medicaments-Triple Antibiotic Paste and Calcium Hydroxide-in patients with infected single-rooted teeth. The purpose is to determine which medicament promotes faster healing of periapical lesions after root canal treatment by measuring reduction in lesion size and improvement in bone density over 3, 6, and 12 months.

Detailed description

This single-center, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial aims to directly compare the efficacy of Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) and Calcium Hydroxide (CH) as intracanal medicaments on the rate of healing of periapical lesions in single-rooted teeth. Systemically healthy adults (18-65 years) with a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis and asymptomatic apical periodontitis or chronic apical abscess, presenting with a radiographically evident periapical radiolucency (≥2mm), will be enrolled. Following informed consent, chemomechanical preparation, and randomization, participants will receive either TAP (Ciprofloxacin:Metronidazole:Minocycline) or CH as the intracanal medicament. The primary outcome is the rate of healing, quantified by the percentage reduction in periapical lesion area and improvement in bone density scores assessed on standardized periapical radiographs or CBCT scans at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups. Secondary outcomes include clinical resolution (absence of pain, tenderness, sinus tract) and radiographic resolution (restoration of normal periapical architecture). Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat analysis, with repeated-measures ANOVA to compare healing trajectories between groups.

Interventions

Intracanal medicament paste composed of Ciprofloxacin, Metronidazole, and Minocycline. Placed in the root canal for several weeks.

Standard intracanal medicament with high pH, used for its antibacterial and tissue-stimulating properties. Placed in the root canal for several weeks

Sponsors

Faiz ur rahman
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Systemically healthy adult patients between 18 and 65 years of age. Presence of a single-rooted tooth diagnosed with pulpal necrosis and asymptomatic apical periodontitis or chronic apical abscess. Radiographic evidence of a distinct periapical radiolucency with a minimum diameter of 2mm. The involved tooth must be deemed restorable after endodontic treatment. Patient willingness and ability to provide informed consent and comply with the follow-up schedule

Exclusion criteria

Patients under 18 or over 65 years of age. Presence of systemic diseases known to affect bone metabolism or immune response (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes). Pregnancy or lactation. Known allergies to any components of Triple Antibiotic Paste or calcium hydroxide. Teeth with previous root canal treatment, internal/external root resorption, root fractures, or non-endodontic periapical pathology.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Periapical Lesion AreaBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsPercentage reduction in the area (mm²) of the periapical radiolucency from baseline, as measured on standardized periapical radiographs or CBCT scans.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Periapical Bone Density ScoreBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsImprovement in a standardized bone density score or grayscale value of the periapical bone from baseline

Contacts

CONTACTFaiz Rahman
faizr3702@gmail.com+923451505838

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026