Skip to content

MJ Arthrocentesis Using the Dental Implant Motor Irrigation Pump and the Conventional Technique in Treatment of Internal Derangement

Comparison Between TMJ Arthrocentesis Using the Dental Implant Motor Irrigation Pump and the Conventional Technique in Treatment of Internal Derangement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07239037
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-11-20
Start date
2024-10-01
Completion date
2025-07-15
Last updated
2025-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

TMJ Disorder

Brief summary

Background: Millions of individuals worldwide suffer from temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders and are characterized by pain and joint dysfunction. TMJ internal derangement (ID) is the most frequent type of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). TMJ arthrocentesis represents a form of minimally invasive surgical treatment in patients suffering from internal derangement of the TMJ Aim of the study: To clinically compare between the effect of TMJ arthrocentesis under high hydraulic pressure by dental implant motor and the conventional method in treatment of TMJ internal derangement regarding pain and mandibular movements.

Interventions

OTHERconventional TMJ arthrocentesis

ten patients with TMJ internal derangement using conventional technique

OTHERMotor irrigation with 80% power

ten patients with TMJ internal derangement with reduction using dental implant motor irrigation pump in power 80%

OTHERMotor irrigation with 40% power

ten patients with TMJ internal derangement with reduction using dental implant motor irrigation pump in power 40%

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* TMJ internal derangement with reduction. * Both genders.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with overlying infection or cellulitis * Relevant systemic disease * Previous TMJ surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain scores1 week, 4 weeks, 3 monthsa 10 point visual analogue scale (VAS)\*. (0-1=none, 2-4=mild, 5-7=moderate, 8-10=severe) .
Change in mouth openingbaseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 monthsThe patient's maximum mouth opening (MMO) value will be measured by taking the average of three consecutive measurements of the distance between the maxilla and mandible mid-central incisive teeth with the Endo ruler after the patients were asked to open

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
post operative edema1 weekScales: * None (no swelling) * Mild (intra oral swelling confined to surgical field) * Moderate (extra oral swelling in the surgical zone) * Severe (extra oral swelling spreading beyond the surgical zone)
change in mandibular movementsbaseline, 1 week, 3 monthsPatient's TMJ Lateral, protrusive and side to side movements will be measured

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 27, 2026