Skip to content

Benign Versus Malignant Causes of Intussuception in Adults

Benign Versus Malignant Causes of Intussuception in Adults : A Prospective Study in Assiut University Hospital

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07238166
Enrollment
35
Registered
2025-11-20
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2025-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intussusception (IS)

Keywords

in adult

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate adult intussecption : * Prevalence of benign vs malignant causes. * Distribution by anatomical type. * Clinical presentation patterns. * Diagnostic accuracy of imaging. * Surgical approach and outcomes. * Length of hospital stay, complications, recurrence

Detailed description

Intussusception is a condition characterized by the invagination of one segment of the intestine into another, leading to obstruction and potentially ischemia (1). While intussusception is relatively common in the pediatric population, it is considered a rare clinical entity in adults, accounting for only 1-5% of all cases and approximately 1% of intestinal obstructions in the adult population. The etiology, clinical presentation, and management of adult intussusception differ significantly from pediatric cases, necessitating a distinct clinical approach (2). In contrast to children, where most cases are idiopathic, adult intussusception is commonly associated with an underlying pathological lead point. In approximately 70-90% of adult cases, a structural lesion can be identified as the cause of the intussusception (3). These lesions may be benign or malignant in nature and understanding the incidence of each is important for appropriate diagnosis and treatment planning (4). In general, intussusceptions involving the small intestine are more likely to be caused by benign lesions such as lipomas, polyps, or Meckel's diverticulum, whereas those involving the colon have a higher likelihood of being associated with malignancy, especially primary adenocarcinoma (5). Adult intussusception poses a diagnostic challenge due to its nonspecific and often chronic symptoms, which may include intermittent abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal bleeding, or signs of partial bowel obstruction (6). The advent of advanced imaging techniques, particularly abdominal computed tomography (CT), has improved the preoperative diagnosis of this condition (7). However, surgical exploration remains the definitive diagnostic and therapeutic modality, especially given the high probability of underlying malignancy (8). Despite advancements in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques, there remains a lack of general agreement regarding the optimal management of adult intussusception, particularly concerning the necessity and extent of bowel resection when a benign cause is suspected (9). Moreover, data on the relative incidence of benign versus malignant causes vary widely across regions, institutions, and populations. This study aims to evaluate adult intussecption, prevalence of benign versus malignant causes in AUH.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsurgical resection and histopathological examination

Adult patient diagnosed with intussusception will undergo surgical resection of affected bowel segment under general anathesia . the resected specimens will be sent for histopathological evalution to determine the underlying cause , whether benign (e.g lipoma , polyp )or malignant (e.g adenocarcinama , lymphoma ). operative finding , postoperative outcome , and pathology results will be recorded and analyzed

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

a. Inclusion criteria: * Age ≥ 19 years. • Confirmed diagnosis of intussusception by: Imaging (CT , ultrasound , or barium studies) Intraoperative findings, * Patients managed surgically with documented follow-up and final diagnosis. b.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with incomplete records or lost to follow-up * Intussusception diagnosed radiologically but resolved spontaneously without confirmatory intervention or follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
prevalence of benign versus malignant causes2 weeks after surgical resectionHistopathological examination of resected bowel specimens will determine whether the cause of intussusception is benign (e.g., lipoma, polyp) or malignant (e.g., adenocarcinoma, lymphoma). The frequency and percentage of each category will be calculated

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation between preoperative imaging findings and histopathological results DescriptionAt the time of diagnosis (preoperative period )Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative imaging (CT scan findings such as target sign, mass lesion) in predicting benign or malignant pathology

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative findingsDuring intraoperative periodTo record intraoperative findings including location of intussusception (small bowel, ileocecal, colocolic), presence of lead point, bowel viability, and type of surgical procedure

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAndrew gamal fikry, MBBCH, MSc ( general surgury )
gamalandrew751@gmail.com+201224173419

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026