Skip to content

Alexis Retractor in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Wound Healing Outcomes With and Without the Alexis Wound Retractor in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07237737
Enrollment
202
Registered
2025-11-20
Start date
2026-12-01
Completion date
2028-01-01
Last updated
2026-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Arthritis, Hip Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

To determine if there is a difference in wound healing and surgical site infection (SSI) rates using the Alexis wound retractor vs. not using it in longitudinal direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty.

Interventions

DEVICEAlexis wound retractor

A surgical device used to retract tissue during procedures, designed to reduce wound trauma and improve healing

DEVICEStandard wound retractor

A conventional surgical retractor used during procedures without the features of the Alexis device

Sponsors

University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing primary unilateral longitudinal direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty * Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with history of prior open surgery on the affected hip * Patients with history of prior total hip arthroplasty on the contralateral hip * Patients with allergies or absolute contraindication to standardized drugs administered within the University of Miami protocol for total hip replacement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Days to Identification of Delayed Wound HealingUp to 14 daysDelayed wound healing is defined as the presence of one or more of the following clinical signs: drainage from wound, wound dehiscence, and superficial surgical site infection. Assessment is performed by clinical examination and documentation in the postoperative period. The outcome is measured in number of days from surgery to identification of delayed healing
Patient satisfaction with scaring as measured by Patient Scar Assessment ScaleUp to 12 monthsUsing the Patient Scar Assessment Scale, which is a validated plastic surgery tool for evaluating scars from the patient's perspective. Measured with a scale from 0 to 10, higher score indicates less satisfaction.
Scar cosmesis as measured by Observer Scar Assessment ScaleUp to 12 monthsUsing the Observer Scar Assessment Scale, which is a validated plastic surgery tool for evaluating scars from the observer perspective. Measured with a scale from 0 to 10, higher score indicates worse scar cosmesis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Reporting Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) SymptomsUp to 6 monthsLFCN symptoms are defined as paresthesias or dysesthesias in the anterior thigh distal to the surgical site. Symptoms are assessed through participant self-report and clinical documentation.
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) - Patient-Reported OutcomeUp to 12 monthsAssessed using the HOOS, a validated instrument for evaluating hip-related disability and osteoarthritis symptoms from the patient's perspective. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating worse patient-reported outcomes.
Number of Intraoperative fracturesUp to 3 hours (duration of surgery)Intraoperative complications will be assessed by counting the number of fractures occurring during the surgical procedure; fractures are identified by the operating surgeon and confirmed via intraoperative imaging or direct visualization.
Length of surgeryUp to 3 hoursDuration of the surgical procedure measured in minutes, from initial incision to closure.
Number of Postoperative ComplicationsUp to 90 daysMeasured by the number of complications including, but not limited to, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), prosthetic hip dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, implant failure requiring revision surgery. Events are identified through clinical evaluation and documentation.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTNatalia Cruz, MD
nxc971@miami.edu305-689-5195
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORVictor H Hernandez, MD, MSc

University of Miami Department of Orthopaedics

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026