Skip to content

Evaluating the Analgesic Efficacy of Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Maxillofacial Surgeries

Evaluating the Analgesic Efficacy of Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Maxillofacial Surgeries : A Comparative Randomized Control Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07236086
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-11-19
Start date
2026-01-31
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2025-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maxillofacial Surgeries

Brief summary

The superficial cervical plexus (SCP) originates from the anterior rami of C1-C4 and gives four cutaneous branches supplying the anterolateral neck, external ear, and shoulder tip (1). A superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) is performed by subcutaneous injection at the midpoint of the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid, targeting these sensory branches using either landmarks or ultrasound guidance. The goal of the ultrasound (US)-guided technique of superficial cervical plexus nerve block is to deposit local anesthetic within the vicinity of the sensory branches of the nerve roots C2, C3, and C4 (2). SCPB has been successfully used for analgesia in mandibular, tympanomastoid, thyroid, submandibular, and clavicular surgeries, and can even serve as the sole anaesthetic technique in external ear procedures (3, 4). As complications may arise while administrating a SCPB, an adequate understanding of the block physiology and local anesthetic toxicity can mitigate these issues. Superficial cervical plexus block shares common complications with other local anesthetic-based nerve blocks including intravascular injection into a vein or an artery, hematoma formation, infection risk and local anesthetic toxicity. It is worthy to refer that complications are of a higher incidence in deep blocks than superficial ones

Detailed description

The superficial cervical plexus (SCP) originates from the anterior rami of C1-C4 and gives four cutaneous branches supplying the anterolateral neck, external ear, and shoulder tip (1). A superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) is performed by subcutaneous injection at the midpoint of the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid, targeting these sensory branches using either landmarks or ultrasound guidance. The goal of the ultrasound (US)-guided technique of superficial cervical plexus nerve block is to deposit local anesthetic within the vicinity of the sensory branches of the nerve roots C2, C3, and C4 (2). SCPB has been successfully used for analgesia in mandibular, tympanomastoid, thyroid, submandibular, and clavicular surgeries, and can even serve as the sole anaesthetic technique in external ear procedures (3, 4). As complications may arise while administrating a SCPB, an adequate understanding of the block physiology and local anesthetic toxicity can mitigate these issues. Superficial cervical plexus block shares common complications with other local anesthetic-based nerve blocks including intravascular injection into a vein or an artery, hematoma formation, infection risk and local anesthetic toxicity. It is worthy to refer that complications are of a higher incidence in deep blocks than superficial ones . Based on this background, the present study aims to evaluate the analgesic effect of US-guided SCPB in maxillofacial surgeries compared with conventional general anaesthesia, focusing on intra- and postoperative systemic analgesic requirements, pain scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), total duration of analgesia, vital parameters, and the incidence of postoperative complications.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsuperficial cervical plexus nerve block

The fascial plane delineating the space between the levator scapulae and SCM can then be detected. Within this striated, hyperechoic substance, a hypoechoic cluster representing the superficial cervical plexus can be visualized, typically located just deep to the posterior surface of the lateral SCM. With an in-plane technique, 22-G needle is introduced parallel to the ultrasound beam, proceeding from the posterolateral to the medial direction. The needle will be advanced through the skin and platysma under real-time ultrasound guidance until it approaches to the plexus. Aspiration will be performed to ensure the needle tip is not within a vascular structure.

DRUGSaline (0.9% NaCl)

patient will recive saline

DRUGBupivacaine

10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered in a supine position with the head turned opposite to the side of the block.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The patient, surgeon, the outcome assessor and the statistician will be blinded about patient's group allocation. The anesthetist responsible for the patient intraoperatively will not be blinded to patient group allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Age 18-65 years * BMI \< 30 kg/m2 * American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) I - III * Patients scheduled for maxillofacial procedures involving submandibular area e.g. submandibular and submental abscesses, neck region e.g. cervical lymph node biopsies and ear lobe procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* • Patient refusal * Coagulopathy * Local infection ate the site of injection * Pre-existing neuropathy or neurological disease * Hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics used

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the first call for rescue analgesia24 HOURSthe elapsed time from the time of block until the first postoperative analgesic use after the end of the surgery, which will be administrated based on patient request

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The total analgesic requirement24 hours.The total analgesic requirement of Nalbuphine in mg given postoperatively
Pain scores; Visual Analouge Scale (VAS) score24 hoursvisual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing postoperatively

Contacts

Primary ContactRahma M. Atef, MBBCH
rahmaelkalyouby@gmail.com01061574582
Backup ContactShimaa A. Hassan, M.D.
Shimaa.abbas@med.aun.edu.eg01002953253

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026