Skip to content

VR Episiotomy Simulation: Impact on Midwifery Students' Skills and Self-Efficacy (VESES)

The Effect of Virtual Reality-Based Episiotomy Simulation on Midwifery Students' Skills and Self-Efficacy Levels

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07235800
Acronym
VESES
Enrollment
87
Registered
2025-11-19
Start date
2025-12-21
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2025-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Use of Virtual Reality Simulation in Midwifery Training

Keywords

Midwifery Virtual Reality Simulation Episiotomy Learning Process

Brief summary

This study aims to develop and evaluate a virtual reality (VR)-based episiotomy training simulation for midwifery students. Episiotomy is a surgical procedure performed during childbirth, and incorrect application may lead to serious psychological and physiological consequences. While traditional training methods often use animal tissues or synthetic materials, recent advances in technology have introduced simulation-based learning. VR technology has shown potential to enhance learning outcomes, confidence, and satisfaction among healthcare students. Despite its growing use in medical education, there is currently no VR training model specifically designed for teaching episiotomy skills. This study will design a VR episiotomy simulation, assess its effectiveness in skill acquisition and learning, and propose it as a new educational method in midwifery training.

Detailed description

This study aims to develop and evaluate a virtual reality (VR)-supported episiotomy simulation training program for midwifery students. The unique contribution of this study lies in assessing skills acquisition, learning processes, and satisfaction differences in VR-based episiotomy training, a field where no previous VR applications for episiotomy skills training have been identified in the literature. A randomized controlled parallel-group design will be employed. The study will take place at Van Yuzuncu Yıl University Faculty of Health Sciences (YYU FHS) between April 2025 and April 2026. The episiotomy topic is covered theoretically and practically within the Risky Birth and Postpartum Course for third-year midwifery students at YYU FHS. Currently, mannequin models are used for episiotomy practice. The study population will consist of third-year midwifery students at YYU FHS, totaling 90 students. The sample will be composed of students who voluntarily agree to participate and meet inclusion criteria. Sample size was calculated using G\*Power 3.1.9.2 software based on the primary dependent variable-mean self-efficacy scores-yielding a minimum of 38 students per group (VR intervention and control groups), with an effect size of 0.50, power of 0.95, and alpha of 0.05. Participants will be randomized equally into two groups using the Random.org platform to prevent selection bias. Inclusion criteria are: proficiency in Turkish, no prior episiotomy training, and no medical contraindications for VR use (e.g., epilepsy). Data collection tools include: Demographic Information Form Skill Evaluation Form Episiotomy Skills Self-Efficacy Scale (EBÖÖ) Student Satisfaction Survey Data collection will be performed by an independent researcher who is not involved in the intervention delivery or study design. Due to the visible nature of the intervention (VR headset vs. mannequin), full blinding of the outcome assessor is not feasible. However, all evaluations will be conducted using standardized assessment tools to reduce observer bias and ensure objectivity. Assessments will occur pre-training, immediately post-training, and one month after training. The intervention includes a two-day training program. On the first day, all students receive four hours of theoretical instruction on episiotomy. On the second day, the control group practices on traditional mannequins for four hours, while the intervention group trains using the VR simulation for the same duration. The VR simulation immerses students in a virtual delivery room where they perform episiotomy and repair using virtual surgical tools and equipment. The VR setup includes VR goggles, two control handles, motion sensors, and a high-performance computer. The episiotomy mannequin used in the control group realistically simulates perineal anatomy for skill practice. Dependent variables are students' skill performance and self-efficacy scores; the independent variable is the VR-supported episiotomy training. Study limitations include the single-center design with only YYU third-year students and the high cost of VR software and equipment. Data will be analyzed using SPSS 25. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) and inferential tests (independent and paired sample t-tests) will be conducted to evaluate group differences and within-group changes. This study is expected to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of VR technology in enhancing midwifery education and propose an innovative training tool for episiotomy skills development.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVirtual Reality Simulation Training

This intervention is a virtual reality (VR)-based episiotomy simulation designed for midwifery students. The training is conducted in an immersive virtual delivery room, where participants perform the steps of episiotomy incision and suturing using VR headsets, motion sensors, and hand controllers. The simulation includes virtual surgical tools and interactive elements that replicate a clinical environment. This VR-based training differs from traditional model-based education by providing a more engaging and realistic experience, aiming to improve students' psychomotor skills and self-efficacy in performing episiotomy.

BEHAVIORALTraditional Episiotomy Training

This intervention consists of a traditional episiotomy training session using physical anatomical models (manikins) in a classroom environment. The training includes hands-on practice of episiotomy incision and suturing on silicone-based or synthetic perineal models, supervised by the instructor. This method reflects standard educational practices in midwifery training and does not involve virtual reality or simulation technology.

Sponsors

Inonu University
CollaboratorOTHER
Yuzuncu Yil University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

No blinding (masking) was applied in this study. Participants were unaware of their group allocation only during the initial training session, but by the time of the one-month follow-up data collection, they were aware of their group assignment. Instructors and outcome assessors were aware of group assignments throughout the study.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to either the virtual reality simulation group or the traditional mannequin training group. Both groups receive the same theoretical education, followed by their respective practical training interventions in parallel.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Able to speak and understand Turkish Have not received previous episiotomy training No medical conditions preventing the use of virtual reality (e.g., epilepsy) Enrolled as a third-year midwifery student at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Health Sciences

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals who do not speak or understand Turkish Those who have previously received episiotomy training Participants with medical conditions contraindicating the use of virtual reality (e.g., epilepsy) Not enrolled as a third-year midwifery student at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Health Sciences

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Episiotomy Self-Efficacy ScoreBaseline (before training), immediately after training, and 1 month after trainingParticipants' episiotomy-related self-efficacy will be assessed using the Episiotomy Skills Self-Efficacy Scale (EBÖÖ), a validated 19-item Likert-type instrument. Each item is scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), with total scores ranging from 19 to 76. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Episiotomy Skill Performance ScoreImmediately after trainingParticipants' practical episiotomy skills will be evaluated through a researcher-developed checklist. This checklist covers key steps in the episiotomy procedure. Each step is observed and scored, providing a total
Student Satisfaction with Training MethodImmediately after training and 1 month after trainingParticipants' satisfaction with the training method (VR or traditional mannequin) will be assessed using a researcher-developed satisfaction questionnaire. This includes Likert-scale questions evaluating the perceived usefulness, engagement, and satisfaction with the training.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactTuba Uçar, Professor
tubaucar@inonu.edu.tr+90 536 761 80 76

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026