Skip to content

Combination Letermovir and Standard of Care Antiviral for Enhanced Antiviral Response in Cytomegalovirus Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients

Combination Letermovir and Standard of Care Antiviral for Enhanced Antiviral Response in Cytomegalovirus Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07235683
Acronym
CLEAR-CMV
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-11-19
Start date
2025-12-24
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2026-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CMV, Lung Transplant Recipient

Keywords

CMV Disease, Lung Transplant

Brief summary

The primary objective of the CLEAR-CMV trial is to evaluate the efficacy of letermovir therapy plus standard of care (SOC) antiviral compared to SOC plus placebo in achieving clearance of CMV viremia by week 3 in lung transplant recipients with active CMV infection.

Detailed description

Lung transplant recipients are particularly susceptible to CMV infection due to intensive immunosuppressive regimens required to prevent graft rejection. CMV viremia is associated with increased morbidity, including CMV pneumonitis, and may contribute to chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).Approximately 30-50% of lung transplant recipients develop CMV infection within the first year post-transplant, with higher rates in CMV-seronegative recipients receiving organs from seropositive donors (D+/R-). Current standard treatment for CMV infection in transplant recipients involves ganciclovir or its oral prodrug, valganciclovir, which inhibit CMV DNA polymerase. While effective, prolonged use is associated with toxicities, including myelosuppression, and the emergence of resistant strains in some cases. Letermovir, a novel antiviral targeting the CMV terminase complex, has shown efficacy in CMV prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, and in kidney transplant recipients. It has now been extensively studied for use in prophylaxis but there are limited data in treatment. It is an attractive drug in transplant recipients because it has an excellent safety profile and requires no dose adjustment for renal dysfunction. However, data on the use of letermovir for treatment (as opposed to prophylaxis) are more limited. A multicenter study of letermovir use for treatment showed reasonable response rates especially in patients with low viral loads. The use of combination therapy for CMV treatment represents an attractive option, as there is extensive experience with other viruses (e.g. HIV , HCV) to show that this strategy leads to improved response rates and lessens the emergence of antiviral resistance. The use of ganciclovir plus letermovir is attractive because they target two different viral enzymes and both have oral options facilitating outpatient treatment. The most recently published international CMV consensus guidelines reports that the use of combination antiviral therapy is a key research need. The investigators plan to conduct a pilot trial to determine the efficacy of letermovir plus standard of care (SOC) antiviral therapy in clearing CMV infection. The trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, Good Clinical Practices (GCP) and the applicable regulatory requirements.

Interventions

DRUGLetermovir

Letermovir (480mg) will be given orally as a loading dose every 12 hours for the first 24 hours, then one tablet per day for a total treatment duration of 21 days. Letermovir treatment will be started within 72 hours of starting SOC antiviral treatment as per the decision of the treating physician.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo will be dosed the same as letermovir: one tablet every 12 hours for the first 24 hours, then one tablet per day for total treatment duration of 21 days.

Ganciclovir or its oral prodrug, valganciclovir will be administered as the standard of care antiviral therapy. Its duration will be at the discretion of the treatment physician but is typically given until clearance of viremia. The clinical definition of viral clearance is one negative viral load or two viral loads one week apart that are \<200 IU/mL

Sponsors

University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recipient of a lung transplant. * Has confirmed CMV viremia with a viral load ≥ 1000 IU/mL and will receive or has just started SOC antiviral treatment in the past 72h as per the decision of the treating physician.

Exclusion criteria

* Renal failure with Creatinine clearance \<15 mL/min or requiring dialysis * Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C) * Participating in another interventional clinical trial * Combined transplant (e.g heart-lung, lung-liver) * Known allergy or contraindication to any of the antiviral medications * Known antiviral resistance. * Patient receiving cyclosporin, pimozide or ergot alkaloids (due to significant drug interaction with letermovir). * Patient receiving or expected to receive CMV immunoglobulin or IVIG during the initial three week treatment phase

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients achieving clearance of CMV viremia by week 3, as measured by quantitative PCR.From time of enrollment until 3 weeks after enrolmentViral clearance is described by a plasma CMV viral load \< 200 IU/mL, the UHN clinically used threshold

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients achieving CMV viral load <137 IU/mL (lower limit of quantification of the assay)At week 3 from enrolment and at 6 monthsLower limit of viral quantitation
Time to clearance of CMV viremiaFrom enrolment until clearance of CMV viremia, up to 6 months after enrolmentClearance of CMV viremia is defined as plasma CMV viral load \< 200 IU/mL as measured by quantitative PCR
Time to resolution of symptoms if presentFrom enrolment until clearance of symptoms, up to 6 months after enrolment
Development of antiviral resistanceFrom enrolment until up to 6 months after enrolmentIncidence of antiviral resistance development to letermovir or SOC antivirals at the discretion of the treatment physician
Incidence of adverse eventsFrom enrolment until up to 6 months after enrolmentIncidence of adverse effects (e.g., myelosuppression, renal dysfunction) will be recorded for the duration of the study.
Proportion of patients with clinically significant CMV recurrence within 6months, as determined by quantitative PCR or symptomatic CMV diseaseFrom enrollment until 6 months.Clinically significant CMV recurrence will be determined by a qPCR viral load ≥1000 IU/mL or symptomatic CMV disease
Proportion of patients achieving an undetectable viral loadAt week 3 and by month 6 after enrolmentThe limit of detection for plasma CMV viral load is 35 IU/mL
Monthly enrollment rate as a measure of recruitment feasibilityFrom start of enrollment until up to 6 months after the final patient is enrolledThe investigators will aim for a target enrollment rate of 2 participants per month

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTAtul Humar, MD, FRCPC
atul.humar@uhn.ca416-340-4241

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026