Skip to content

Comparison Between the Analgesic Effect of Fascia Transversalis Block vs Caudal Block

Comparison Between the Analgesic Effect of Fascia Transversalis Block vs Caudal Block in Pediatrics Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Surgeries: Randomized Double-blinded Comparative Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07235475
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-11-19
Start date
2025-11-25
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Operative Pain, Acute

Brief summary

Despite the growing interest in interfascial blocks and their successful use in pediatric surgeries, no previous randomized clinical trials have directly compared the analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing effect, and safety profile of the fascia transversalis block versus the caudal block in pediatric patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair. This study aims to address this gap by providing the first head-to-head randomized comparison between both blocks in a standardized surgical setting

Interventions

Patients will receive a caudal block with 0.5 mL/kg of Bupivacaine 0.25% injected. The commercial preparation that will be used is Bupivacaine HCl (Sunny Pharmaceutical, Egypt)

PROCEDUREFascia Transversalis Block

Patients will receive Fascia Transversalis Block using 0.5 mL/kg of Bupivacaine 0.25% . The commercial preparation that will be used is Bupivacaine HCl (Sunny Pharmaceutical, Egypt)

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA physical status I or II, scheduled for elective unilateral inguinal hernia surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Parental refusal. * Pre-existing infection at block site. * Coagulopathy (defined as INR \>1.5, Platelets \<100,000). * Known allergy to local anesthetics. * History of complications from regional anesthesia. * Emergency or bilateral hernia repair. * Neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., cerebral palsy, spina bifida).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to the first request for rescue analgesia24 hours post-operativelythe interval between the end of surgery (extubation) and the first need for analgesia (paracetamol)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total intraoperative fentanyl consumptionfrom the start of general anesthesia until the extubation
Postoperative FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) pain scores24 hours postoperativelyEach of the five behaviors will be scored on a scale of 0 to 2. The scores are then added together to get a total score, which can range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain).
Total paracetamol dose in 24 hours24 hours postoperatively
Parental satisfaction score24 hours postoperativelyWill be measured using a 5-point Likert scale: 1. = Extremely dissatisfied 2. = Unsatisfied 3. = Neutral 4. = Satisfied 5. = Extremely satisfied

Contacts

Primary ContactAbdelKhalek Shaban
dr.obad86@yahoo.com+201025854248

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026