Skip to content

MRI Role in Knee Hemophilic Arthopathy

MRI Vs Conventional Radiography in Assessing Knee Hemophilic Arthropathy : A Scoring Based Approach

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07233122
Enrollment
95
Registered
2025-11-18
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2025-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthropathy Hemophilic, Arthropathy of Knee, Hemophilia, MRI

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess role of MRI in detecting synovial, cartilaginous , osseous abnormalities ، bleeding inside knee joint and to use a system for assessing HA as support for therapeutic regimes and for monitoring response to therapy .

Detailed description

Hemophilia is a mostly inherited genetic disorder caused by a complete or partial deficiency of coagulation factors VIII or IX, which impairs the body's ability to form blood clots-a process necessary to stop bleeding. This results in prolonged bleeding after injury, easy bruising, and an increased risk of internal bleeding, particularly within joints or the brain. Hemophilic arthropathy (HA), caused by recurrent hemarthrosis, is the most common musculoskeletal manifestation of hemophilia and one of the most disabling complications of the disease. It can lead to severe pain, deformity, destruction of the joint, debilitating arthritis, and permanent joint damage. Clinical assessment plays only a minor role in detecting the early stages of HA, as early clinical signs are often nonspecific and of limited value in quantifying disease involvement. Conventional radiographs mainly detect bone lesions that appear in advanced HA, but they cannot identify early changes such as synovial hypertrophy or focal cartilage destruction. Computed tomography (CT) is highly sensitive for detecting bone changes, but it provides limited information on soft tissue involvement and requires a relatively high dose of ionizing radiation. By contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft tissue contrast, allowing detailed evaluation of hemophilic joints and visualization of synovial and cartilaginous abnormalities. T1-weighted imaging: evaluates bone marrow, joint anatomy, and subchondral changes. T2 fat-suppressed imaging: useful for detecting synovitis and joint effusion. Gradient echo (GRE) or susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI): detect chronic blood products (hemosiderin), with SWI being more sensitive and able to identify earlier blood deposits. Several scoring systems exist for the assessment of hemophilic arthropathy, including the European scoring system and the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) MRI scale. The IPSG system provides more detailed scoring and greater sensitivity for early disease, including subtle synovial changes. For radiographs, the most widely used system is the Pettersson radiographic scoring system. In this study, the investigators will use the IPSG MRI scoring system and the Pettersson X-ray scoring system to evaluate hemophilic arthropathy, with the aim of improving grading, management, and follow-up.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient ( more than 18 years old ) diagnosed as Haemophilia with history of bleeding in knee joint more than once

Exclusion criteria

* \*contraindications for MRI such as claustrophobia , metallic foriegn body carriers , cardiac pacemaker * patient refused the exam * Pregnant female patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) MRI Score for Hemophilic ArthropathyAfter completion of MRI scanning session (within the same study visit). Overall Study Duration: 2 years (for recruitment, imaging, and data analysis).Assessment of knee hemophilic arthropathy severity using the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) MRI scoring system. This scoring system evaluates early and advanced joint changes such as synovial hypertrophy, hemosiderin deposition, and cartilage/bone damage.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pettersson X-ray Score for Hemophilic ArthropathyAfter completion of X-ray scanning session (within the same study visit). Overall Study Duration: 2 years (including recruitment, imaging, and data analysis).Assessment of knee hemophilic arthropathy severity using the Pettersson X-ray scoring system. This system evaluates joint space narrowing, osteoporosis, subchondral cysts, erosions, and bone deformities to quantify the degree of arthropathy.
Agreement Between MRI and X-ray Scoring Systems in Hemophilic ArthropathyAfter completion of MRI and X-ray scanning sessions (within the same study visit). Overall study duration: 2 years (including recruitment, imaging, and data analysis).To evaluate the agreement between the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) MRI score and the Pettersson X-ray score in assessing the severity of knee hemophilic arthropathy. This outcome will determine the level of concordance between the two imaging modalities in detecting joint changes.

Contacts

Primary Contactkerolos wagdy maurice morid, principal investigator
Cerles.17289725@med.aun.edu.eg+201062053217

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026